If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
A modifier is not necessary but you want to be sure that you are not billing an office visit for someone who only received a shot. You can only code an E/M if the physician provides and documents a valid E/M.
we modify the office visit if the patient has one, and also has a flu shot. The E/M significant, separately identifiable from the "added" flu shot. If they're coming in for flu shot only - then there isn't an E/M (or a need for a modifier then).
we modify the office visit if the patient has one, and also has a flu shot. The E/M significant, separately identifiable from the "added" flu shot. If they're coming in for flu shot only - then there isn't an E/M (or a need for a modifier then).
I don't happen to agree... if a child comes in for a sick visit and the Doctor sees that it is also time to update a vaccine (lets say Dtap or Hep A) we don't add modifier 25 so why would we add it for Flu? It's still just a vaccine. I guess there may be a commercial carrier that requires it or perhaps a state Medicaid program but I bill most of the major commercial carriers (UHC, BCBS [North Carolina], Aetna, Cigna, Medcost) and none of them deny payment on the office visit if it has it's own diagnosis attached.
the 90465 etc. should only be billed if there is documentation in the chart that they physician counseled the patient (or in this case, parents) on the pros/cons of the vaccine. If there is not documentation that the counseling occurred then you should use the 90471 etc.