• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • We’re introducing new features and a new look to make the forums easier to use and more valuable to you. See what's new and let us know what you think!

Modifier 51 Versus Modifier 59

Sborkowski

Guest
Messages
1
Best answers
0
My billing company is insisting that my office no longer use modifier 51 and to append modifier 59 in place of. I feel this is incorrect but how should they bill multiple procedures if the insurances are not allowing the 51 any longer. This is in Delaware. Any advice would be appreciated.
 

pamtienter

Expert
NAB Member
Messages
347
Location
Minneapolis
Best answers
0
I don't agree that the 59 modifier replaces the 51 modifier but a lot of insurance companies treat the 51 modifier as informational only. It used to be used to designate which procedures received the multiple procedure reduction but payers go by the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule now so don't rely on the physicians to provide that information any more.

The 59 modifier designates that a procedure is separate and independent from another procedure billed and relates to CCI edits. It should only be used if there is no other applicable or appropriate modifier that could be used instead.

Is it that insurances aren't allowing it anymore or is it just unnecessary? I don't know what it hurts to use it if they just aren't recognizing it. I also wouldn't just substitute the 59 across the board because that could raise some red flags (as well as possibly being inappropriate in a lot of cases). I'd check into it further.
 

magnolia1

Expert
Messages
457
Location
Albany, New York
Best answers
0
Totally wrong!

Have they looked at the descriptions of those two modifiers in the CPT book?
Are they aware that this may send up a red flag to Medicare (and possibly OIG??).
Modifier 59 is only to be used if there is no other modifier that better describes a "separately distinct" non-E/M procedure that has been performed.
That has nothing to do with "multiple procedures" being done.
I would consider looking for another billing company......
 

mitchellde

True Blue
Messages
13,292
Location
Columbia, MO
Best answers
0
Well said Karen! I totally agree, I provided consulting service with a billing company that also thought and taught their coders that the 51 and the 59 were one in the same, what a pain that was to re teach! Many commercial carriers have dropped the 51 from their electronic edits because they did feel it was unnecessary, so it is not that they do not recognize it, it is just not adjudicated properly in the electronic edits. But as karen stated this is not a substitute across the board for the 59, they never did communicate the same information. Good Luck with this, what you want now is to hire an auditor to audit your billing service, you may be very unpleasantly surprised at what you learn!
 
Top