• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
  • Important Note: We will be performing a scheduled maintenance on 1st November 2020. The site will be offline from 7:30PM (MT) till midnight. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Modifier 59 position

creagerc

New
Messages
6
Location
Seattle
Best answers
0
I received a claim back for a 29822 and a 23120. According to RVU's 29822 is Line one followed by 23120.
29822 is a component of 23120 and a modifier is needed to unbundle. So when I entered my charges this is what it looked like.
29822 SG59LT
23120 SGLT

The 29822 was denied because the insurance didn't like the 59 on the first line. Is it appropriate to either
1. switch the order of the CPT codes or
2. Put the 59 modifier on the line that has no bundling issues?

Thank you,
Carmel :eek:
 

dmaec

True Blue
Messages
1,133
Location
Hibbing, Minnesota
Best answers
0
I'd switch the order of the codes. I wouldn't put the .59 on the 23120.
23120.SG.LT
29822.SG.59.LT

{that's my opinion on the posted matter}
 

elenax

Expert
Messages
337
Location
Stuart
Best answers
0
Are you billing for an ASC:confused:...The 'SG' modifier is not valid anymore for an ASC...try removing the SG modifier!!:D
 

Lisa Bledsoe

True Blue
Messages
2,046
Location
Greeley, Colorado
Best answers
0
You should always use the modifier that "drives the payment" first. So in this case, -59 would come first. Also, NELENAZ is correct -SG is not required UNLESS you are billing a payor who has not followed the rest of the pack (in my case Rocky Mountain Health Care). Happy Coding!
Lisa
 
Top