• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • We're introducing new features and a new look to make the forums easier to use and more valuable to you. See what's new and let us know what you think!

Psychiatric E/M for deaf client

jcochran

Guest
Messages
54
Location
Saint Paul
Best answers
0
So, when a client who is congenitally deaf who comes in for her quarterly med check we have a little confusion as far as coding. After reviewing all of the documentation from my psychiatrist, this definitely meets the 1997 documentation guidelines for 99214, but at the end the MD noted that face to face time with client is 60 minutes and also noted this due to the client's deafness, ASL was needed, therefore prolonging the visit to 99215.

So my question is, given that the face to face time is noted as 60 minutes, would it be appropriate to code 99215 even though the rest of the documentation for E/M only supports 99214 other than face to face time with client?

Also, I know that because it was only 60 minutes face to face, 99354 (prolonged services) would be inappropriate; however, would a modifier 22 for increased services be appropriate? Also note, this is a Medicare client.

Any feedback is greatly appreciated, thank you~
 

1073358

Expert
Messages
454
Best answers
0
I would bill 99214. In order to bill a 99215 based on time, over half of the time spent must be in counseling and coordinating care, which it does not sound like it was. It simply took longer because he is deaf. I would not use 22 mod either.
 

clsteph1

Guru
Messages
187
Location
Indianapolis
Best answers
0
I'd have to agree with smdumpert. The Interactive Psychotherapy Codes with E&M services may be more appropriate. The use of an interpreter of any kind does qualify the service as an "interactive" therapy service.
 

1073358

Expert
Messages
454
Best answers
0
I'd have to agree with smdumpert. The Interactive Psychotherapy Codes with E&M services may be more appropriate. The use of an interpreter of any kind does qualify the service as an "interactive" therapy service.
That would only be appropriate if this dr is actually performing therapy. There are some- alot actually- that do not do therapy.

The op's notes say a med check and that would not qualify as therapy
 

jcochran

Guest
Messages
54
Location
Saint Paul
Best answers
0
That would only be appropriate if this dr is actually performing therapy. There are some- alot actually- that do not do therapy.

The op's notes say a med check and that would not qualify as therapy
yes, unfortunately, this was not an interactive therapy visit, client was in office for her medication check only. Visit was very extensive due to the need for ASL, and client needed several clarifications on her medication changes. We ended up leaving this as a regular 99214.

Thank you all so much for your feedback:) I really appreciate it:)
Jessica
 
Top