Removal of Hardware

ceverlith

New
Messages
5
Location
Grand Canyon Phoenix
Best answers
0
All you orthopedic guru's I need some clarification.

Truama patient taken to surgery for an ORIF of distal radius with plates and screws by othro on call. Referred to my surgeon the hand specialists. My surgeon finds a "NEW" fracture distal to the plate. My surgeon has to remove the original plate "not put in by him" and replace with longer plate to cover now both fractures. We coded removal of hardware because we did not put the hardware in and ORIF of the "new" fracture. I am being denied the removal stating it does not matter who put the original plate in all is global. I do not agree!!:confused: Any thoughts???

____________
Signed Upset
 
Messages
4,466
Location
Milwaukee WI
Best answers
0
Modifier

This is NOT my area of expertise, but ...

Did you use any modifier? I would have put a -59 on the hardware removal to indicate that it was a separate proceduure from the fracture treatment.

If the payor is adamant about the hardware removal being included, then you might want to consider adding -22 modifier to the basic fracture treatment code, and increasing your fee by X% for the added difficulty / time this took over and above the usual procedure.

Just my thoughts ...

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CPC-E/M
 

eblanken

Networker
Messages
79
Location
Norman, OK
Best answers
0
What code did you bill for the ORIF of the new fracture? I checked the edits for 25607, 25608, & 25609 and none of them show to have 20680 bundled.
 
Messages
114
Location
Madison Area Chapter in Madison WI
Best answers
0
My understanding is the removal of the original hardware is considered part of the second hardware procedure. You can't do the replacement without removal of the original. Because it is much harder and takes more time, resources, etc to remove the hardware prior to the replacement, the 22 modifier is appropriate. I apologize because I don't recall where this is documented. I think it was in a CPT Assistant. Does anyone have anything to support this logic?
 

mbort

True Blue
Messages
2,338
Location
ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
Best answers
0
I agree with Claudia and FTessa. Unfortunately you will not be able to capture for the removal on its own, so I would do a corrected claim with the 22 modifier and send the documentation to support it,
 
Top