Results 1 to 4 of 4

Diabetes Coding

  1. #1
    Default Diabetes Coding
    Medical Coding Books
    When educating our providers in the clinic, we are telling them that uncontrolled diabetes won't be coded unless it's documented as uncontrolled. One doctor is saying that if the Hgb A1C is >8, it is obviously uncontrolled and should be able to be coded as such, even if she leaves out the word uncontrolled.

    The ICD-9 Official Guidelines say "Effective October 1, 2008: Abnormal Findings- Abnormal findings (laboratory, x-ray, pathologic, and other diagnostic results) are not coded and reported unless the provider indicates their clinical significance. If the findings are outside the normal range and the attending provider has ordered other tests to evaluate the condition or prescribed treatment, it is appropriate to ask the provider whether the abnormal finding should be added. Please note: This differs from the coding practices in the outpatient setting for coding encounters for diagnostic tests that have been interpreted by a provider."

    Does this mean "uncontrolled" needs to be specified?

    How are others coding these? Are you using the uncontrolled diabetes diagnosis codes even if they don't specify uncontrolled but have an A1C result?

    Thanks for your help!
    Pam Tienter, CPC, COC, CPC-P, CCS-P, CPMA, CPC-I, AAPC Fellow
    National Advisory Board Member 2018-2021, Region 6 Great Lakes
    Minneapolis AAPC Chapter, Education Officer 2018
    AHIMA ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
    AAPC National ICD-10 Trainer

  2. #2
    Default diabetes coding
    I was taught not to code from lab results. These must be interpreted by a physician or other qualified clinician (NPP) and results documented in the medical record. Once those results are documented and signed by the physician, then and only then can we use them as a diagnosis. We may know from experience, and the results may certainly imply, what the patient's diagnosis is, but we can't code it until the Dr. says so.

  3. #3
    Albany, New York
    We are coders, not Lab Technicians, Pathologists, or Physicians.
    We are trained to code based on what is documented, not to interpret test results.
    Karen Maloney, CPC
    Data Quality Specialist

  4. #4
    i agree with anna....dont code it as uncontrolled based on the path/lab results. let the doc know that you need her to document it and sign it for you to code it...after all, YOUR credentials are on the line!

Similar Threads

  1. coding diabetes
    By mwould5450 in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-16-2014, 05:15 AM
  2. diabetes coding
    By kjohnson in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 08:26 PM
  3. Coding Diabetes-Physician sees a diabetic
    By Debbie C in forum Auditing General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-17-2010, 08:03 PM
  4. coding diabetes
    By arizona1 in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-10-2009, 07:47 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.