Results 1 to 3 of 3

Assistant to Neurology

  1. Default Assistant to Neurology
    Exam Training Packages
    Our doctor did a retroperitoneal exposure, and a Neurosurgeon and a Vascular surgeon were all involved in the case. The neuro listed our doctor as his assistant, and the Vascular surgeon listed our doctor as the second assistant. They were removing a tumor, which involved the arteries and the nerves. The problem is that none of them want to bill as consurgeons or as a team. It was my understanding that our doctor can't bill independently for the exposure (49010). I am not sure at this point what codes they are going to use, but it would seem that if they were all working through the same incision that some would need to bill at a reduced rate because they were all working in the area that our doctor exposed through his approach. Any thoughts would be appreciated.



  2. #2
    Milwaukee WI
    Default Team - 66 mod
    What the neurosurgeon and vascular surgeon want isn't the same as what should be coded.

    I think this should be accurately coded as a team (-66 modifier).

    Each surgeon should dictate his/her own operative note describing the part s/he played in the total surgery.

    You will have to coodinate with these other surgeons so that everyone uses the same basic code with -66 modifier (for example: 58957-66).

    If either of the surgeons did some additional procedure from the basic procedure, s/he can code that separately (assuming it doesn't bundle).

    I know that surgeons hate this ... but they can't expect to be paid a full fee if they didn't perform EVERYTHING associated with the surgery ... they relied on the general surgeon to open/close, so the team modifier seems appropriate.

    F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC

  3. #3
    North Carolina
    Based on what you have said, I agree with you. When our neurosurgeons work with a general surgeon, they bill as co-surgeons. Access and closure are an inherent part of the surgical procedure. You cannot "separate out" the exposure for coding purposes or for separate payment. Since the vascular surgeon and neurosurgeon are working together to provide a single indentifiable procedure, It should be reported with modifier 62 or team...whichever is applicable. I would reference this with 40.8. That's my .2 cents.

Similar Threads

  1. neurology
    By aparscal in forum Neurology/Neurosurgery
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-13-2015, 02:05 PM
  2. Neurology
    By sholetbro in forum Employment General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-13-2012, 09:57 AM
  3. Neurology?
    By broundy in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-18-2010, 12:48 PM
  4. Neurology
    By mlb2152 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-16-2009, 10:09 AM
  5. 1st assistant and 2nd assistant surgeon
    By hudsondna in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-13-2008, 05:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.