Results 1 to 4 of 4

Modifier 77

  1. #1
    Question Modifier 77
    Medical Coding Books
    I have a question regarding the usage of the 77 modifier. I work for a cardiologist office and we have both cardiologists and electrophysiologists in our office. In an instance that a patient may see both doctors on the same day would the modifier 77 be appropriate or is there another modifier that may be better suited? The situation in question is where the patient was scheduled to see the cardiologist and then he has suggested that he see the electrophysiologist. Please help....

  2. #2

    I think it would depend on the service(s) being coded. Modifier 77 would be appropriate if a "procedure" performed by one surgeon had to be repeated by another for some reason, repeat EKG's, etc. If you are billing for E/M services, then this modifier would not be used.
    Sylvia Thompson, CPC
    Billing Supervisor
    San Diego, CA

  3. #3
    If it were a E/M for both a EP doctor and a cardiologist visit what modifier could be used? Cariten is suggesting that a modifier be added to the claim. I am looking in my CPT book but there is not a modifier that stands out. Any suggestions?

  4. #4

    I've looked through my coding resources, etc. and can't find a modifier to use to unbundle e/m codes, as in your scenario. I know that you can't bill for two e/m visits for the same physician but never heard that you required a modifier in order for two different physicians to bill for e/m services. I wonder if this is payor based; as with Medi-Cal's limitation restrictions on the number of consults allowed. Do each of your providers have their own Provider #'s to bill with?

    What modifier is Cariten suggesting? A -59? Up until recently, I didn't realize that it was acceptable to use Modifier -59 for services other than those typically considered "procedures". As per CCI, -59 can be used on a number of different codes, not just "procedures". Perhaps, this is something worth looking into.

    Sorry I couldn't be of more help....I'll keep reading your thread to see what other coders recommend. Good Luck!
    Sylvia Thompson, CPC
    Billing Supervisor
    San Diego, CA

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2015, 01:17 PM
  2. Modifier 59 vs Modifier 91 for Laboratory
    By leahrey in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-23-2015, 12:01 PM
  3. MODIFIER PT VS MODIFIER 33 Screening Colonoscopy
    By Ann Johnson in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-19-2012, 07:08 AM
  4. Modifier 58 versus Modifier 78
    By Ramona03 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-04-2012, 12:10 PM
  5. Modifier 51 Versus Modifier 59
    By Sborkowski in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 03:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.