AAPC - Back to school
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Laparoscopic Appendectomy with lysis of adhesions (salpingolysis)

  1. #1

    Default Laparoscopic Appendectomy with lysis of adhesions (salpingolysis)

    AAPC: Back to School
    Can anyone give me some instructions on billing 44970 and 58660? It seems like since the surgeon was already in there laparoscopically for the appendectomy that a modifier should be applied to 58660. If so, which one? The services aren't bundled, and only one (58660) is an endoscopic code. Will Medicare pay both at 100% if no modifier is applied? That doesn't seem right to me. The only thing I can think of is to apply modifier 52.

  2. #2


    58660 is bundled in 44970 can not be billed together for same date of service. There is no modifier which can be used in such case.
    Medicare will just pay for 44970 and deny 58660 stating inclusive in 44970.

    Neha Bhatnagar, CPC, CPC-H

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Kokomo, IN

    Default lysis adhesions

    Lysis of adhesions cannot be billed separately, however, if you have extensive adhesions and it's documented as such, then you could add the 22 modifier to your procedure and submit documentation for extra pay. Some carriers will pay more for being more complicated than a simple appendectomy. Some won't. There should be documentation that it required extra time, effort, supplies etc. Some of my docs will now dictate that it took an "extra hour of time as the adhesions were extremely dense" or something of this nature. Must be clearly documented that it took extra time and skill. Sometimes the Doc's just write "adhesions lysed". This doesn't get a 22, it becomes part of the surgery. Even if they say adhesions were extensive, it's not enough to get the 22, but this is controversial.
    Good luck.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Greeley, Colorado


    I don't show those codes as bundled. However, 58660 is a "separate procedure" so you could add mod -59 since the lysis of adhesions was performed on the tubes/ovaries - a totally separate location/organ than the appy. 58660 would not be incidental to the completion of the appy...just my thoughts/opinion.
    Lisa Bledsoe, CPC, CPMA

  5. #5


    Thanks for the reply...can you tell me where you found they were bundled? I searched the NCCI edits and couldn't find where they are bundled.

  6. #6

    Smile Lysis of adhesions

    CPT 58660 & CPT 44970 are bundled. Please check for Flashcode Or Encoderpro software CCI edits for these codes.

    Neha Bhatnagar
    CPC, CPC-H

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Kokomo, IN

    Default lysis adhesions

    Quote Originally Posted by TammyFarris View Post
    Thanks for the reply...can you tell me where you found they were bundled? I searched the NCCI edits and couldn't find where they are bundled.
    In the book:Procedural coding professional 2009 put out by AAPC, page 353 the coding guidance states:
    Lysis of adhesions should not be reported together with any other surgical laparoscopic procedure.

    There are other rules out there and I can tell you some will code the lysis other's won't. I haven't had any luck getting lysis paid so I quit coding unless it was by itself, and started adding the 22 modifier if extensive, leaving it as inclusive if done with another procedure, if they are not.

    It's an individual thing I think, like many things coding, there isn't an easy answer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007


    I agree with Anna Weaver, if your doc will document the extra time in the body of the op report you can bill it with a -22, get the rejection and then appeal with op report and a copy of the OR log that shows the begin and end time of the procedure. You should also reference the amount of time it usually takes to perform the same procedure without the added work of the adhesions. The worst they can do is hold up the denial.

  9. #9


    Thanks so much for the very helpful info!!! It appears I need a few more books on my desk!!!

Similar Threads

  1. Laparoscopy/adhesions/laparotomy/appendectomy/lavage
    By bda23054 in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-28-2012, 11:55 AM
  2. Laparoscopic lysis of omental adhesions
    By sknapp56 in forum OB/GYN
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-14-2012, 09:07 AM
  3. Laparoscopic lysis of pelvic adhesions
    By burnam in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-19-2011, 06:15 AM
  4. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions
    By graciejean in forum OB/GYN
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 06:08 AM
  5. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy w/lysis of adhesions
    By bpiggott in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-11-2009, 02:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.