Results 1 to 6 of 6

1995 guidelines for exam question???

  1. Default 1995 guidelines for exam question???
    Medical Coding Books
    Hi Everyone,

    Hope you all can help. We are trying to find out what specifically is considered a " Complete Single Organ System Exam" based on the 95 guidelines.

    Per our intermediary "Trailblazer" it is undefined and we have doc's intent on using the 95 guidelines over the 97". I cannot locate any specific language that tells me how to use the 95 guidelines for complete single organ system exam when auditing? For examples: number of bullets...

    Any takers?


  2. #2
    So far as I am aware, there are no specific "bulleted" guidelines for the exam when using the 1995 guidelines. (This lack of specificity is one of the main reasons the 1997 guidelines were created.)
    My audit tool (which is from NHIC) has a list of body areas/organ systems to choose from but doesn't provide much detail.
    From what I hear, many auditors use the 1997 guidelines as reference. This is mostly to find the line between Expanded Problem Focused and Detailed exams.
    Hope this helps a little bit, even if it's not exactly what you're looking for.

  3. Default
    Thanks, I had a feeling thre were no specifics!

  4. #4
    95 doesn't allow for a complete (compehensive) single system exam. That is one of the big differences between 95 and 97.

    Laura, CPC

  5. #5
    Kansas City, MO
    This topic came up last year at a local chapter meeting. There was one member that said her office had contacted their specialty society and a director at a medical school with the question of what they considered a comprehensive single organ system exam. (I don't remember which organ system) The information they received added up to a 28 point exam. In turn, they took that information and educated all of their providers and then developed a coding and documentation policy to provide an outline for their comprehensive single organ system exam. She then went on to explain that when their charts are audited, a copy of the policy is provided to the auditor.

    Yes, it is allowed the problem is that there was no consensus as to what each single organ system exam should include, hence the 97 Guidelines. Here is what the 95 Guidelines say:

    The levels of E/M services are based on four types of examination that are defined as follows:
    • Problem Focused -- a limited examination of the affected body area or organ system.
    • Expanded Problem Focused -- a limited examination of the affected body area or organ system and other symptomatic or related organ system(s).
    • Detailed -- an extended examination of the affected body area(s) and other symptomatic or related organ system(s).
    • Comprehensive -- a general multi-system examination or complete examination of a single organ system.

    The extent of examinations performed and documented is dependent upon clinical judgement and the nature of the presenting problem(s). They range from limited examinations of single body areas to general multi-system or complete single organ system examinations.
    !DG: Specific abnormal and relevant negative findings of the examination of the
    affected or symptomatic body area(s) or organ system(s) should be
    documented. A notation of "abnormal" without elaboration is insufficient.
    !DG: Abnormal or unexpected findings of the examination of the unaffected or
    asymptomatic body area(s) or organ system(s) should be described.
    !DG: A brief statement or notation indicating "negative" or "normal" is sufficient
    to document normal findings related to unaffected area(s) or asymptomatic
    organ system(s).
    !DG: The medical record for a general multi-system examination should include
    findings about 8 or more of the 12 organ systems.
    Angela Jordan, CPC, COBGC, AAPC Fellow
    Senior Managing Consultant
    Medical Revenue Solutions, LLC
    AAPC National Advisory Board - Southwest
    AAPCCA BOD Chair 2012-2013

  6. #6
    Default Reg. Angela's note
    Basically this refers back to the principle if there is no detailed guideline, write and implement a policy and stick to it.
    This makes sense.

Similar Threads

  1. 1995 Exam Guidelines
    By KJAYNE in forum E/M
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-10-2014, 11:59 AM
  2. 1995 Documentation Guidelines Question Exam
    By rlmiller in forum Auditing General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-29-2013, 10:42 AM
  3. E/M Exam 1995 guidelines
    By mblackburn in forum E/M
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-14-2012, 06:50 AM
  4. 1995 Guidelines for Exam
    By Julie Zunker in forum E/M
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-17-2010, 09:11 AM
  5. Question about 1995 exam guidelines
    By coder25 in forum E/M
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-24-2008, 01:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.