Results 1 to 6 of 6

Modifier 25 - I code for a group of hospitalist

  1. #1
    Default Modifier 25 - I code for a group of hospitalist
    Exam Training Packages
    I code for a group of hospitalist. They have "discovered" the CPT code 99358They use it along with their subsequent visit codes- 99231,99232, and 99233 Does the 99238 need a modifier 25 or the subsquent visit codes?

    Thanks for your help.


  2. #2
    Columbia, MO
    no need for a 25 the 99358 is an add on code. just be sure they are documenting time spent not only face to face with the patient but also floor time as it relates to that patient. if time is not documented they should not be using the 99358.

  3. #3
    Thanks for taking the time to answer my question.

  4. #4
    Milwaukee WI
    Default 99358 NON face-to-face
    99358 is specifically for NON face-to-face time spent in reviewing extensive patient records, communicating with other care givers, etc.

    Do NOT include the face-to-face time of the E/M code in calculating the time spent for 99358. Time must be documented; time must be at least 30 minutes beyond the E/M service before you can code this.

    F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC

  5. #5
    Columbia, MO
    Thanks for catching that Tessa! I was off by a code section. Tessa is correct no face to face time on that one.

  6. #6
    Longmont Colorado
    yes, prolonged services codes are necessary esp in inpt setting to maximize reimbursment. And it strengthens the case for using time-based coding as your primary method of determining E/M levels.

    I advise my providers to make sure to document why the extra time was needed - ex: (I spent the additional time reviewing old records, lab results, coordinating care with other physicians, etc.)

    Just makes for stronger documentation in an audit.
    Brad Howard, CPC, AHIMA Approved ICD-10 CM/PCS Trainer
    McKesson Specialty Health

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2015, 02:17 PM
  2. Modifier 59 vs Modifier 91 for Laboratory
    By leahrey in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-23-2015, 01:01 PM
  3. MODIFIER PT VS MODIFIER 33 Screening Colonoscopy
    By Ann Johnson in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-19-2012, 08:08 AM
  4. Modifier 58 versus Modifier 78
    By Ramona03 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-04-2012, 01:10 PM
  5. Modifier 51 Versus Modifier 59
    By Sborkowski in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 04:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.

Get OurFREE2017SalarySurvey.

We'll email you a link to our 2017 Healthcare Salary Survey when it is available so you can see your earning potential.