Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Colonoscopy ?screening

  1. #11
    Medical Coding Books
    [QUOTE=mitchellde;61070]I am not sure which guidelines you are referring to but there is only one set of official guidelines. The following is an excerpt from these guidelines:

    From Section I under screening it says:
    Should a condition be discovered during the screening then the code for the condition may be assigned as an additional diagnosis.

    Not to get into the middle of this one, because I do believe that each opinion is validated, but doesn't the "may be" in that quote from the guidelines constitute a decision by the coder to do so? It doesn't seem like it is mandated in that statement. For us here, we use the V code for Medicare and BX but for everyone else, we use the 211.3 code. I am not trying to make waves, I am legitamitely confused by all of this. Do you follow the "surgery" guidelines or do you follow the "screening" guidelines? We are also CAH so our case proably doesn't apply to all.

    In the end, I guess I also agree with Gloria that since even the "big wigs" can't agree, we do what we have to, individually, to code what we believe to be "to the best of our ability".

  2. #12
    Columbia, MO
    I disagree, I feel the guidelines are very clear on the subject of screening. My question is why code it different for different payers? This says you are coding for reimbursement then. The scenario did not change just becuse the payer changed. The guidelines state:
    The testing of a person to rule out or confirm a suspected diagnosis because the patient has some sign or symptom is a diagnostic examination, not a screening. In these cases, the sign or symptom is used to explain the reason for the test.
    A screening code may be a first listed code if the reason for the visit is specifically the screening exam. It may also be used as an additional code if the screening is done during an office visit for other health problems. A screening code is not necessary if the screening is inherent to a routine examination, such as a pap smear done during a routine pelvic examination.

    Also Coding clinics state:
    Whne the reason for the encounter is screening, then screening remains the first-listed code regardless of the findings or any additional procedure performed due to the findings.

    If a patient does not have screening as a benefit then they are responsible for the payment. However if they do have screening benefits and you code it as a diagnostic exam, then they will most likely have out of pocket expenses like deductible that would not have incurred. I have seen this happen numerous times and then try to unravel it on the back end (no pun intended) is very time consuming.

    So my point being if it is screening for a Medicaid patient then with the same scenario it is screening for everyone.

  3. #13
    I definitely see your point! As far as coding differently for different payers, I couldn't agree more. I am walking a very fine line here by doing that. Trying to explain that to my supervisors, however, is another issue completely. But anyway, thanks for the clarification, Deb. Maybe I can use it as ammo with management here. Have a good day

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Screening Colonoscopy versus Surveillance Colonoscopy
    By wsoler in forum Gastroenterology
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-16-2017, 11:41 AM
  2. Screening colonoscopy
    By beachgrl62 in forum Anesthesia
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-05-2015, 10:00 AM
  3. Screening Colonoscopy vs Problem Colonoscopy
    By puggles in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-25-2014, 06:08 AM
  4. E/M and screening colonoscopy
    By katelliott80 in forum Gastroenterology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 12:48 PM
  5. Screening Colonoscopy
    By DLB in forum Gastroenterology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 08:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.