Results 1 to 2 of 2

Health and Human Services Meeting - Feb. 11th, 2008

  1. #1
    Default Health and Human Services Meeting - Feb. 11th, 2008
    Medical Coding Books
    Our Washington, DC lobbyists along with other lobbyists from the AMA, Blue Cross Associations met with seven staff members from Health and Human Services regarding implementation of ICD-10 on February 11, 2008.

    We have recommended to CMS that the implementation dates for ICD-10 be carefully evaluated because:
    • The history of HHS setting deadlines in these types of situations that then had to be extended is extensive: HIPAA, 4010, 5010, NPI, attachment regulations etc.

    • ICD in other countries only covers inpatient codes not outpatient.

    • Canada found ICD-10 for outpatient care too expensive.

    • We must have 5010 first.

    • If the transition to ICD-10 is not smooth, there is a greater possibility of fraud which has declined noticeably under Medicare because of the software programs developed to detect fraud in ICD-9.

    • The transition to the 15 MACs in Medicare is massive and another significant transition such as ICD-10 should await its conclusion.

    • Careful planning of “crosswalks” from ICD-9 to ICD-10 is needed.

    • Extensive pilot programs are needed to test the systems before mandated compliance of ICD-10.

    • BC/BS felt that with a later effective date enough testing could be done which would reduce the transition period.

    HHA staff told AAPC that they really do not have a set timeline for this transition and it is still under discussion within the Department. Currently the plan is October, 2010, but that is under serious review. We recommended it be pushed back further for the above reasons.

  2. #2
    Exclamation workload
    Only a matter of time until medicine advancements out way ICD-9 tabulated capabilities. If America is planning on implementing ICD-10 in the future, they should start preparing and developing systems to weather change. If the only thing preventing an advance update is money and education, U.S. citizens should reprioritize there priorities, especially coders. Multi-million dollars a year coding errors should raise a green flag to change; Although, ICD-10 implementation shouldn't be rushed until the industry is well prepared.

Similar Threads

  1. SG Modifier Per Coding Edge Feb. 2008
    By bella2 in forum Outpatient Facilities
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-13-2008, 10:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.