Results 1 to 7 of 7

Modifier 25

  1. #1
    Default Modifier 25
    Exam Training Packages
    I have a patient that underwent surgery months ago, and now has a wound seroma. She continues to follow-up in the office every 2 weeks, (THE PLAN)with the physician for a wound-VAC closure. My question is can we bill an office visit every time the patient comes back with a mod 25. The physician has this plan for the patient, and the patient is only being seen for the wound-VAC closure. However, the physician is dictating an HPI for the cancer diag, along with a Past HX, and Phy Exam, but is only treating the patient for the wound closure. Because he is doing an HPI, and Phy Exam, is the procedure considered separately identifiable??????
    Kristen Richard, CPC

  2. #2
    Seacoast- Dover New Hampshire
    Are they in a 90 day global? If they are, it is part of the surgical package.
    Karen Barron, CPC
    Hampton New Hampshire Chapter

  3. #3
    The patients surgery was in January, so no global period pertains.
    Kristen Richard, CPC

  4. #4
    Please help!!!! If anybody knows the answer to this question, I would greatly appreciate a response. This patient continues to come back to our office for this wound-VAC closure of this complicated wound... Please keep in mind, that this is a planned procedure, not within a global period, and the doctor dictates a HPI, PFSHx, and physical Exam on every visit due to the diagnosis of the patient, History of stage 1A, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus.

    Please help!!!!! Do I bill the office visit with a mod 25 and the procedure 11040, or just the procedure?????
    Kristen Richard, CPC

  5. #5
    Seacoast- Dover New Hampshire
    I would only code the procedure as that is the chief complaint.
    Karen Barron, CPC
    Hampton New Hampshire Chapter

  6. #6
    Seattle First Hill
    In this case, you should only be billing the procedure. An E/M is only billable if it is for a separate, unrelated problem.

    Hope this helps!
    Kirsten, CPC

  7. #7
    Hi Kirsten, in this scenerio, I too would only code the procedure as you are not meeting the definition for use of the -25 mod with and E/M.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2015, 02:17 PM
  2. Modifier 59 vs Modifier 91 for Laboratory
    By leahrey in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-23-2015, 01:01 PM
  3. MODIFIER PT VS MODIFIER 33 Screening Colonoscopy
    By Ann Johnson in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-19-2012, 08:08 AM
  4. Modifier 58 versus Modifier 78
    By Ramona03 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-04-2012, 01:10 PM
  5. Modifier 51 Versus Modifier 59
    By Sborkowski in forum Modifiers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 04:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.