Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

95 & 97 Guidelines

  1. Default
    Medical Coding Books
    Quote Originally Posted by KAM5657 View Post
    Thanks! Another question, would you use 95 or 97 for a specialists office? I just heard that 95 should be used for a specialist & 97 for PCP's. Has anyone else heard that before???
    I noticed while auditing that many specialist coders use 95. In my opinion, the ability to obtain a higher level is more user friendly, if I may, when using the 95 guidelines because of the focus to one body area.

  2. #12
    Just went to auditing seminar yesterday- seems to be that most auditors use 97 guidelines when auditing, but if you use 95 guidelines, they cannot say that you are wrong.

    Also- be consistant!! Choose one or the other and stick with it- always. :d

  3. #13
    New Windsor, New York
    Default Surprising
    Many specialists use 95??? I always believed 97 guidelines were introduced because specialists felt 95 hurt them because they would do detailed exams in the area/system of their specialty instead of many different systems. The only specialty which I have audited has been OBGYN - and 97 will often be more beneficial to them.


    Director, Health Information Management
    HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
    Kingston, NY

  4. #14
    Central Pittsburgh
    The other thing to do is to check with your local carrier. Some have an audit tool that will show that they are actually doing a bit of mixing of the 95 and 97 guidelines.

    Never stick with just one guideline. If you are a specialists office, the 97's might help on some patients and the 95's might help on others. It's good to have both handy to check.

    I have found with some of the specialty offices, after they do their exams, the 95's are actually more beneficial. Yet with others, because of the nature of the specialty, the 97's are more helpful.

  5. #15
    I agree with the statement " check with your carrier" some carriers may allow something that another one doesn't. I know that in my area, if auditing a CBC/KHP claim they use the 1997 DG and they have that info posted on their website as well. Just be careful.
    Roxanne Thames CPC, CPC-I, CEMC

    "Remember the greatest gift is not found in the store but in the heart of true friends"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. 95 & 97 documentation guidelines for E & M services
    By in forum E/M
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2015, 07:55 AM
  2. I&D Guidelines
    By adale in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-15-2011, 09:06 AM
  3. E&M 97 versus 95 guidelines
    By DTATRO in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-28-2009, 03:18 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 07:19 AM
  5. E & M guidelines
    By 01051184 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-15-2008, 06:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.