Results 1 to 3 of 3

Diagnosis code-I Have a problem

  1. Default Diagnosis code-I Have a problem
    Medical Coding Books
    I Have a problem in diagnosis coding for following scenario. clinical indication states Kidney stone. The impression states no evidence of kidney stone.
    Is it okay to code kidney stone diagnosis even though the doctor says No evidence of kidney stone. Likewise in many Radiology reports a condition is given in indiaction and the impression states the condition no more exist.
    Your inputs please!!

  2. Default
    i'd go with v71.89

  3. #3
    Since the findings are normal then you can use the 592.0 if that was given for the test.
    Here are some guidelines we use from RadiologyToday:

    1. Signs and symptoms are acceptable diagnoses when a diagnosis is not confirmed. For example, if a patient is sent to a radiologist to rule out an ankle fracture and no fracture is found, medical necessity is nonetheless established if pain and swelling of the ankle are documented and coded. ICD-9-CM developers created the symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions chapter to handle situations in which a suspected illness is ruled out, but symptom codes appear in specific chapters as well. In the case of a ruled-out ankle fracture, the appropriate diagnostic codes would be found in the musculoskeletal chapter—719.07, Effusion of ankle and foot joint. The notes under this code state “Swelling of joint, with or without pain,” so a separate pain code would not be required.

    2. Abnormal test results are acceptable diagnoses when further tests are negative. An abnormal blood test or x-ray may lead a provider to order a more complex test. When this occurs and the more extensive test is negative, the earlier positive test result can be listed as the primary diagnosis to establish the medical necessity of the follow-up exam. For example, an ultrasound shows an anomaly in the gastrointestinal tract of a patient, but the follow-up MRI is negative. The primary diagnosis for the MRI would be 793.4, Nonspecific abnormal findings
    Last edited by jgf-CPC; 03-16-2010 at 11:30 AM. Reason: added more info

Similar Threads

  1. Code the scenario: Capture the primary diagnosis code only
    By Ally718 in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-22-2015, 08:41 AM
  2. changing diagnosis code on claim when secondary denies the diagnosis code
    By in forum Billing/Reimbursement
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-27-2013, 10:00 AM
  3. Diagnosis code for No Pathologic Diagnosis
    By benji1266 in forum Pathology & Clinical Laboratory
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-02-2013, 07:00 AM
  4. To code or not to code: Mild (diagnosis)?
    By Jessheartz in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-01-2012, 12:29 PM
  5. what to code: diagnosis vs diagnosis
    By mjl903 in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-23-2011, 11:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.