Results 1 to 3 of 3


  1. #1
    Long Island/New York
    Default 27248
    Medical Coding Books
    Dr performs a Total Hip (27130). After it's completed he sees that the posterior aspect of the greater trochanter is still somewhat fragmented. He decides to perform a repair of this fragmentation (27248). Now would this revelation allow an addition of a 59 modifier since Medicare bundles 27248 with 27130. I think not since there was no separate incision but would it fall under a separate issue? Just want a second opinion.

  2. Default
    I am going to say not...seem the doc did the thr for other reason so i would consider it a incidental finding

  3. #3
    Long Island/New York
    thanks...always like a second opinion.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.