How would this be formatted?
I'm currently a medical transcriptionist and will be completing the coding course in a few weeks. I have a dictation from one of our doctors and need help with formatting:
Dr. X always starts his dictations with a subtitle describing the type of service (he's the only one I know of who does this); for instance, I am working on a report right now where he dictates:
"This is a level 4, 99214 check back with a number 25 E/M modifier and a number 51 E/M modifier on patient xxx..."
Would this translate to
LEVEL 4, 99214-25-51 CHECK BACK
I searched my textbook and flipped through the CPT and the workbook and couldn't find info on coding multiple modifiers so I am not sure.
I would have several questions..........
1) mod -51 is not appropriate with an E&M code
2) is this a note to the coder on how he wants this encounter coded? Meaning instead of using a superbill he is noting his coding as a pre-statement to his visit documentation. Does the coder see this pre-statement?
3) I really wonder how an auditor would look at this. Would it be viewed he is dictating the note to meet his stated E&M level rather than the code being assigned based on what was done (medical necessity)
Last edited by sbicknell; 06-11-2010 at 03:39 PM.
Well, now that you mention it, I remember that -51 would be inappropriate!
He nearly always starts his dictations this way, and I have always transcribed this as a subtitle in the report, but I would spell out the word modifier...and not append the modifier to the E/M (out of ignorance of coding conventions)...this is the first time I can recall that he has listed a second modifier.
Thanks for your helpful feedback!! I'll put this in QA.
I have just never seen a physician start his note with that kind of coding statement. When the note is sent back to the Physician who made the referral/consult request, dose this coding statement remain in the note? I think you're right to have QA look at this. I wonder if other physicians in the practice are aware that he is doing this
I have to say, too, that I'm quite sure this goes through a coder before it's reported for billing.
I don't know...I did just get confirmation that a coder looks at it before billing takes place, and that person probably just rolls her eyes. He's trying to be helpful, but I'm learning a little knowledge can be dangerous!!!!
Tags for this Thread