Results 1 to 4 of 4

Infant death after birth

  1. #1
    Wenatchee Washington.
    Default Infant death after birth
    Medical Coding Books
    Not sure how to code this one;
    Infant had HR of 120 during onset of labor, dropped to 70 and then 0 during birth. Infant recieved CPR, intubation etc for 24 minutes before being pronounced dead.
    I'm leaning toward 669.93 however my coworker feels that there is a better code.

  2. Default
    You said during birth FHR 0 From when the partogram showed 0. During birth 0 includes it to still birth. no matter how long they gave a trial of rescicitation.What was the diagnosis and documentation by the Physician-Still birth or neonatal death. Did they give an APGAR SCORE. If they gave a score,then it is not Still Birth/Still Born; and based on V30 or 779.9-
    We do as they document the live status or still born.

    As for the 5th digit, did they document Fetal distress or any maternal condition that relates to bring fetal distress. If yes, then the 5th digit would be 3. If no documentation of fetal distress, then it can be over to 4. and handed over to Pediatrician table!

  3. #3
    Wenatchee Washington.
    Provider documented neonatal demise, no fetal distress.

  4. Default
    So no fetal distress recorded no complications recorded. Single live born hospital Delivery without mention of cesarean delivery V30.00.
    I feel instead of 669.93 ,why wouldn't we give 659.7x as the conditon of your situation for 5th digit. Wouldnt that be appropriate with (no documentation of any complication of delivery, labor or puerperium on maternal side for the maternal record) going into the category of normal delivery, and other indications for care in pregnancy, labor and Delivery.
    Maternal records are so clean and as I said, the NB is handed over to paed for the New born record to be opened up with them and we are neither allowed to provide for NB record, nor new born -perinatal conditions are allowed to be entered into MR.
    And from the info from you (ie from the doctors document), neither of maternal condition actually affected the fetus or NB to contribute for the perinatal period codes within 760-763 , if at all we could step into the perinatal period coding.
    Am I sensible ?

Similar Threads

  1. Preterm Infant
    By mlourdes in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2014, 08:28 AM
  2. Hep c in infant
    By mjs1974 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2014, 10:06 AM
  3. Infant Hearing Screen
    By Cassandra Stone in forum Neurology/Neurosurgery
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-17-2013, 11:18 PM
  4. Fussy Infant
    By dballard2004 in forum Pediatrics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 09:02 AM
  5. Infant codes
    By JTiger115 in forum Interventional Radiology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2010, 02:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.