Results 1 to 9 of 9

Rectal polyp ICD-9 569.0 vs. 211.4

  1. #1
    Long Beach, CA
    Unhappy Rectal polyp ICD-9 569.0 vs. 211.4
    Medical Coding Books
    How do you know when to use ICD-9 569.0 vs. 211.4 when coding a rectal polyp? I have a pathology report for a rectal biopsy that indicates that the diagnosis is "Fibroepithelial polyp". I would code this a a benign neoplasm of the rectum or 211.4. My co-worker disagrees and says it should be coded as 569.0. In the ICD-9-CM book it differenciates these codes based on whether or not the polyp is adenomatous (211.4) or non-adenomatous (569.0). If the polyp is benign wouldn't it be considered adenomatous?

    I'm confused. Please help!
    Thank you!
    Last edited by pcordill; 05-29-2008 at 05:32 PM.

  2. #2
    Red face
    I was trained to code it as 569.0 but I would benefit from some feedback too.

  3. #3
    It should be coded as 211.4. DX code 569.0 excludes adenomatous anal and recal polyps.

  4. #4
    I agree with 211.4

  5. #5
    I use 569.0 because I was taught that adenomatous means gland. Most of the polyps that are removed from the rectum do not have anything to do with the gland(s) so 569.0 would be appropriate. Maybe I was taught wrong. Anybody else have a definition of adenomatous?
    Susie Corrado, CPC
    ENT Coding/Billing

  6. #6
    Red face Rectal Polyp
    familial adenomatous polyposis:
    "a disease of the large intestine that is marked by the formation especially in the colon and rectum of numerous adenomatous polyps which typically become malignant if left untreated"

    211.4 is appropriate.
    Kimm Hall CPC, CMSCS, CGCS

    If you live to regret then you have not learned lifes lessons.

  7. #7
    Long Beach, CA
    Thank you all for your help! I still find this a confusing subject but will be sticking with 211.4.

    Pattie C.

  8. Default
    Would 211.4 also include the perianal area?

  9. #9
    St. Louis West Missouri
    Fibroepithelial polyp is basically fancy for skin tag and when they're found in the rectum, they're sometimes referred to as hypertrophied anal papillae which is coded to 569.49.

    Whether or not you'd use 569.49 or 569.0 is up for debate. I can argue it both ways in my head all by my lonesome, but I definitely wouldn't use 211.4 since adenomas are glandular tumors, not epithelial tumors. The pathology will state whether or not the polyp is an adenoma. If it's reported as any other kind of polyp, then I don't use the 211.4 code.

    This is an excerpt from one of my favoritest books: Surgical Pathology of the GI Tract, Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas:

    Hypertrophied anal papillae, also known as anal fibroepithelial polyps, are benign polypoid projections of anal squamous epithelium and subepithelial connective tissue. They result from enlargement of anal papillae, which are barely perceptible triangular protrusions located at the base of the anal columns (columns of Morgagni). They are present in 45% of patients who undergo proctoscopic examination and are believed to be acquired structures.[21] They are twice as common in men as in women, and range in size from 0.3 to 1.9 mm, with a mean diameter of approximately 1 cm. They may be asymptomatic, in which case they are usually found in isolation as a solitary firm, palpable mass on digital examination, or develop in association with an irritation, infection, or chronic fistula or fissure in the anal canal.[21–23]They may also coexist with hemorrhoids and, not surprisingly, are confused with hemorrhoids …
    Last edited by MAult142; 12-13-2013 at 03:35 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Rectal Polyp Coding
    By ccaron in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-05-2015, 01:36 PM
  2. rectal polyp
    By codedog in forum Outpatient Facilities
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-07-2014, 10:27 AM
  3. 211.4 vs 569.0 which dx to use?
    By DRBasel1045 in forum Gastroenterology
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 02:59 PM
  4. rectal polyp or hx of...?
    By mkm1517 in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 03:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.