Results 1 to 7 of 7

DX help!!!!

  1. #1
    Default DX help!!!!
    Medical Coding Books
    Pt here because he is unable to get mutliple erections....Would you use either of these codes? 607.84 or 302.72 or 302.79...

    Any help is appreciated

  2. #2
    you would never use the 302... these are mental health codes. I always use the 607.84 for ED. BC/BS doesn't pay for this unless the pt has ED because of DM or Prostate cancer.
    Stacey Lindsey-Smathers, CPC, RMC

  3. #3
    Thanks for your help....

    The patient has no other issues but a significant other that does not understand why he cannot get multiple Erections.. Go figure

    Thanks again

  4. #4
    Stuart, Florida
    Lol. I wouldn't code it as erectile dysfunction though. I mean, the way you make it sound is, he can get an erection but, once the deed is done, he can't get it up again. What he needs is to give his pecker a rest! Sheesh! Is there a code for being a horny creeper?! Haha.
    Vanessa Mier, CPC

  5. #5
    LOL is right. So what code would you use? I am at a lost. I thought abt v41.7 but dont think that can stand as principle.

    Thanks again

  6. #6
    Stuart, Florida
    V41.7 can be used as a primary and/or additional DX code, as it is considered a non-specific diagnosis. However, I'm thinking that V65.5 would be more appropriate to assign in this situation.

    V65.5 is the code for Person with feared complaint in whom no diagnosis was made. Additional notations for this code include "Feared condition not demonstrated", "Problem was normal state", and "Worried well".

    V65.5 is the code you would assign when a person comes in with a complaint that is actually a normal finding.

    Hope this helps!
    Vanessa Mier, CPC

  7. #7
    Columbia, MO
    I do not see the V41.7 being applicable at all. Just because he cannot get repeated erections during a single encounter does not mean there is a problem with HIS internal organs! He sounds really normal to me. Maybe the spouse could use some counseling for unrealistic expectations.
    All that aside I agree with the V65.5, or maybe even a V71.xx for observation for suspected condition not found. Just not sure how to go without the actual note.

    Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.