Results 1 to 8 of 8

Foreign Body Removal - tick left behind

  1. #1
    Default Foreign Body Removal - tick left behind
    Medical Coding Books
    We had a patient come in with remnants of a tick left behind.
    The MD froze the area, and with a needle removed the top of a scab, and 2 small remaining tick parts were removed. He then used Drysol to stop a spot of bleeding. Would you code this with 10120?
    Thanks for your help!

  2. #2
    Two questions: Did he truly make an incision? Did he go down to the subcutaneous tissue?

    I'm thinking the answer is probably no which may leave you with just an E/M code but I could be wrong.

    Did he debride the area? If so, then perhaps you could use a debridement code.

    Anyone else with any thoughts on this?

  3. #3
    He didn't debride the area, and he didn't make an incision exactly. He removed the top of the scab with a needle, and doesn't say how he reoved the tick parts. It was once explained to me, that the act of the foreign body piercing the skin can also count as the incision. I have always been suspicious of that rationale. Thoughts anyone?

  4. #4
    I see where your trying to go with this one. And judging off what you wrote, you might think like me. Always trying to push the envelope, and get the most for your physician. Within compliance of course.

    But on this case, looks like I would just code this bundle with the E/M. Your pushing it, trying to get a Incision & Removal of Foreign Body CPT out of this.



  5. #5
    If documentation doesn't specifically say an incision was made, then I would bill the E&M code only.


  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Erica1217 View Post
    If documentation doesn't specifically say an incision was made, then I would bill the E&M code only.


    I agree w/Erica.....If it is NOT DOCUMENTED-it was not done....


  7. #7
    Duluth, Minnesota
    it doesn't sound like a foreign body removal to me. I think it should be billed out as an E/M level only.

  8. #8
    I live in Minnesota and we see TONS of tick bites and tick removals with a needle and we just code the E&M level unless the physician specifically documents that the skin was incised. Glad to see others agree because I have often questioned if I should be coding the removal. Thanks!

Similar Threads

  1. foreign body removal
    By vjefcoats in forum Emergency Department
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-25-2014, 10:46 AM
  2. foreign body removal - E/M or billable
    By ggparker14 in forum Emergency Department
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-16-2012, 07:50 PM
  3. Removal of Foreign Body - removal of foreign body
    By JCampbell in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-02-2011, 03:44 PM
  4. Foreign body removal?
    By Trudy Haws in forum Gastroenterology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-17-2011, 11:24 PM
  5. Removal of Foreign body
    By BrendaC1957 in forum Family Practice
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 09:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.