AAPC - Back to school
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: 19302 or 19301 debate

  1. #1

    Default 19302 or 19301 debate

    AAPC: Back to School
    Good Morning:

    I am in debate with surgeon regarding report dictated and lack of detail needed to code what the physician is stating they want billed, "even if it is not the letter of the law." "This is the way other dedicated breast surgeons code and bill." The physician codes 38525, 19302 and 14301.

    Trying to leave out the unnecessary details the operative note reflects: .....rt breast inject.....an incision made low in the right axilla, ......lymph node identified.....sent to pathology and found free of tumor. Right axilla subsequently closed....... In the rt breast .....2 lesions one biopsied in cancer. A curvilinear incison made in rt breast, carried down to subcutaneous tissue. Lumpectomy was done encompassing the 2 masses that were less than 2 cm apaprt. Medial and superficial margins reexcised due to palpably close margins. .........Superior and inferior breast flaps raisded of approx 30 cubic centimeters in each direct..........closed in the midline. Subcutanious tissue closed.

    I don't believe 19302 mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy is supported since there is no mention of excision of the node chains consisting of nodes between superficial pectoralis major and pectoralis minor as well as axillary nodes. The physician argues that was done with the original exicison of the node fo rbiopsy (38525). I believe this excision of nodes would be separate from the sentinel node(s) removed earlier and sent for biopsy.

    Am I taking the CPT book and Coders Desk Reference too literal?


  2. #2

    Default 19302

    In order to report 19302 it must be a complete axillary dissection of all sentinel nodes. Were dyes or tracers used to mark the node(s)? There is also the issue of if any muscle was removed or not? There would be a different code for use in musculature removal.

    I would ask your physician to read through the CPT Assistant September 2008, Volume 18, Page 5, and after reading discuss with them to see if you can come to an agreement.

    Hope that helps.

Similar Threads

  1. Please help settle a debate!
    By karen57 in forum E/M
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-10-2011, 07:28 AM
  2. 19301
    By codedog in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-01-2011, 09:25 PM
  3. 19301 or 19302
    By codedog in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-29-2010, 12:43 PM
  4. 19302 vs 19301 & 38525
    By deborahcook4040 in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-20-2010, 04:15 PM
  5. Debate
    By Angela Schwarzkopf in forum E/M
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-06-2007, 01:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.