Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: use of 786.59 vs. 786.50

  1. #1

    Default use of 786.59 vs. 786.50

    One of our new coders as well as our sister facility use 786.59 exclusivly for chest pain regardless of symptoms or documentation because 'it covers everything.' To me there is a difference between the two. What is common practice out there?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    45

    Default

    I personally and all the coders I work with use 786.50 unless the documentation specifies the specific type of chest pain. You never want to code something that's not specified in the documentation.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Just my opinion:
    786.50 - should be used for chest pain when the specific location is not identified and it is not identified as non-cardiac chest pain.

    786.59 - should be used when the documentation states non-cardiac chest pain, chest pain due to a non-cardiac issue, or does not actually state pain instead it lists chest discomfort, pressure, tightness...etc.

    The professional edition of ICD-9 has a tip under 786.59 that states:
    "Assign for chest pain due to anxiety, along with an additional code for anxiety. Chest pain is not integral to the diagnosis of anxiety." This tip is what lead me to believe if the chest pain is due to a non-cardiac issue the 786.59 should be coded.

    Also, per the 2011 GEMs for ICD-10 on the CMS website.
    786.59 converts to R07.89 Other chest pain & R07.82 Intercostal pain, which again supports the idea if the pain is non-cardiac use 786.59.

Similar Threads

  1. Receiving denials on 786.50
    By deeva456 in forum Cardiology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-07-2014, 06:38 AM
  2. diagnosis 786.50 VS 413.9
    By acodingangel in forum Cardiology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-06-2013, 04:59 PM
  3. 518.89 vs 786.6
    By Kimberley in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-17-2011, 04:50 AM
  4. DOE - Do not use 786.09??
    By heatherwinters in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-16-2009, 09:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.