Results 1 to 3 of 3

Laparoscopic lysis of pelvic adhesions

  1. #1
    Default Laparoscopic lysis of pelvic adhesions
    Medical Coding Books
    I have a question regarding coding of lap. lysis of pelvic adhesions:

    Our physicians' dictation states as follows (I am only putting the information pertinant to the procedure):
    Preop Diagnosis:
    Pelvic pain, dyspareunia, probable pelvic adhesive disease & failed medical management
    Postop Diagnosis:
    Same with severe pelvic and abdomial adhesions, resolved
    Procedure performed:
    Operative laparoscopy
    LigaSure ligation of pelvic and abdominal adhesions

    Op Findings: Anterior abdominal wall to omental adhesions over the entire anterior abdominal wall area adn cholecystectomy scar area of the anterior abdominal wall and right upper quadrant. There were left adnexal adhesions and posterior cul-de-sac adhesions, now 90 percent improved.

    Procedure: Patient brought to OR, prepped and drapped in dorsal lithotomy position. All supplies for lap procedure were placed. Ligasure ligation was done to take the anterior abdominal wall to omental adhesions down without bowel damage or major blood vessel damage. once the lower anterior pelvic abdominal wall could be seen safely, a 5 mm suprapubic trocar was placed under direct visualization. There was no bladder or bowel damage noted. Futher adhesions were taken down inferior to this all the way to the posterior cul-de-sac which there was a small amount of adhesions involving this area but mostly the vaginal cuff was freely mobile. At that time, the right upper quadrant adhesions were taken down using ligasure with no liver or vital organ damage noted. All trocars were removed, etc for completion of procedure.........

    I would like to know how other coders would code this procedure? Our hospital is coding it as an unlisted laparoscopic procedure and having trouble getting it paid. I have always been informed to code these as 58660, but would like to know which is the correct way to code.

    Thank you in advance.

  2. #2
    I would use 44180 or 58660. Depending on documentation, nature of and better reporting for RVU purpose when it comes down to either or.

    -based on documentation you've provided


  3. #3
    Thank you so much for the clarification. the hospital coders are wanting to use code 49329 and I just hate using that code when the physician is adamant that it is 58660.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-18-2014, 08:45 AM
  2. Laparoscopic lysis of omental adhesions
    By sknapp56 in forum OB/GYN
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-14-2012, 09:07 AM
  3. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions
    By graciejean in forum OB/GYN
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2010, 06:08 AM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 12:53 PM
  5. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy w/lysis of adhesions
    By bpiggott in forum General Surgery
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-11-2009, 02:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.