Results 1 to 5 of 5

Microscopy and E/M same date

  1. #1
    Default Microscopy and E/M same date
    Medical Coding Books
    I have a new ENT starting up, and he's billing 92504 on almost all the patients. He is seeing the patients for a consult for ENT problems, and sometimes performing a cerumen impaction removal (69210) as well. Is it appropriate to bill 92504 as well on these visits?

    It seems that 92504 would be included in the E/M coding, but the CPT book says

    "Diagnostic or treatment procedures usually included in a comprehensive otorhinolaryngologic evaluation or office visit, are reported as an integrated medical service, using appropriate descriptors from the 99201 series. Itemization of component procedures (eg, otoscopy, rhinoscopy, tuning form test) does not apply.
    Special otorhinolaryngologic services are those diagnostic and treatment services not usually included in a comprehensive otorhinolaryngologic evaluation or office visit. These services are reported separately, using codes 92502-92700."

    What do people think about this?
    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Default
    Hi,

    After reading the paragraph preceding 92504 titled "Special Otorhinolaryngologic Services", I would code 92504 as a seperate service. I would also code the 69210 as long as you have that seperate dx to support it. I also read in an article from "Family Practice Coding Alert" that the ear irrigation dictation must also indicate that an instrument was used in addition to the flush to remove the cerumen. Something I wasn't aware of.

  3. #3
    Default
    If your doctor uses the binocular microscope for every EM, it seems that he/she is using it as part of the exam and it is not separately billable. There has to be a reason to use it, in order to separately bill it.

    Although 92504 has xxx global days (no global definition), cci 7.2 added the definition of a minor em as being part of xxx globals. So, if the em is a significantly separately identifiable em service from 92504, you can put a 25 modifier with the em with the 92504.

    Finally, removal of impacted cerumen is a separate procedure, meaning that anything else done in the ear is considered incidental to the removal of the cerumen, meaning that the binocular microscopy is included. Similarly, 92504 is also a separate procedure, meaning that anything else done in the ear is incidental to the microscope. So, one or the other can be charged, not both. Also, as you read, yes, 69210 must require substantial physician skill and instruments, such as forcepts, curettes, etc.

  4. #4
    Location
    New Port Richey & Gulf to Bay
    Posts
    107
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by b.cobuzzi View Post
    If your doctor uses the binocular microscope for every EM, it seems that he/she is using it as part of the exam and it is not separately billable. There has to be a reason to use it, in order to separately bill it.

    Although 92504 has xxx global days (no global definition), cci 7.2 added the definition of a minor em as being part of xxx globals. So, if the em is a significantly separately identifiable em service from 92504, you can put a 25 modifier with the em with the 92504.

    Finally, removal of impacted cerumen is a separate procedure, meaning that anything else done in the ear is considered incidental to the removal of the cerumen, meaning that the binocular microscopy is included. Similarly, 92504 is also a separate procedure, meaning that anything else done in the ear is incidental to the microscope. So, one or the other can be charged, not both. Also, as you read, yes, 69210 must require substantial physician skill and instruments, such as forcepts, curettes, etc.
    I agree 92504 and 69210 is considered unbundled, when coded seperately. It is either one of the other not both.

  5. #5
    Location
    Stuart Sailfish Chapter
    Posts
    867
    Default
    I agree with Barb. I have had to jumo these hurdles with my new Doc. I am sendnig him to the E/M conference in Orlando, and my ARNP to the one in tampa.

    I hope they pick up a little knowledge out of it.


    Candice Ruffing, CPC
    Drs Berghash & Lanza P.L.
    cruffing@otodocs.com
    Candice Fenildo, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CPB, CENTC, CRHC, AAPC Fellow
    Director of Operations
    Ear, Nose and Throat Associates of South Florida, PA
    772-342-6976
    cfenildo@entsf.com


    "Nothing is stronger than the heart of a volunteer"

Similar Threads

  1. Billing products date of order vs date of dispense
    By annawade13 in forum Compliance General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-2013, 12:29 PM
  2. Billing date of service versus date report was read?
    By tawnyagarrett in forum Cardiology
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-21-2012, 08:53 PM
  3. Post Op debridement or binocular microscopy?
    By tlivengo in forum ENT/Otolaryngology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-04-2010, 07:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.