Results 1 to 4 of 4

Another audit question - accuracy rate

  1. #1
    Location
    Ellenville, New York
    Posts
    1,176
    Default Another audit question - accuracy rate
    Exam Training Packages
    When performing self-audits or coding reviews, whether they are for physicians who code their own records or done by coding staff, what is typically the minimum standard? Our senior administrators want to set the standard at 100% accuracy for our clinic physicians, who must assign their own codes. I am not comfortable with 100%, only because we are only human and this leaves absolutely no room for human error. I suggested 95% because I believe I have read literature that this was the standard for certified coders. What do others use and do you have literature? Thank you for all responses!

  2. #2
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by MnTwins29 View Post
    When performing self-audits or coding reviews, whether they are for physicians who code their own records or done by coding staff, what is typically the minimum standard? Our senior administrators want to set the standard at 100% accuracy for our clinic physicians, who must assign their own codes. I am not comfortable with 100%, only because we are only human and this leaves absolutely no room for human error. I suggested 95% because I believe I have read literature that this was the standard for certified coders. What do others use and do you have literature? Thank you for all responses!
    100% is a little ambitious; Our threshold is 80% for mandatory re-audits. You can educate everyone who doesn't meet 100%, but keep in mind that auditing is subjective; one auditor may find that a physician only got 90% of their charts correct, while a different auditor could say that they were closer to 100%. The point of doing it at all is educating them and mitigating any risks of submitting false claims; not to grade them for the sake of grading them. If they're going to insist on 100% accuracy, I'd strongly suggest providing education on proper documentation techniques, then giving the providers enough time to incorporate it into their work, before you start nit-picking them over every little issue, unless you want a whole lot of ticked-off doctors.

    Texas Tech's Health Sciences Center has a great policy for their internal auditing, which actually takes the nature of the mistakes into account when doing their scoring; not all errors uncovered in an audit are the provider's fault, so you have to be prepared for that, as well. Here's a link to their policy: http://www.ttuhsc.edu/billingcomplia...rov_042111.pdf


    The main page is here: http://www.ttuhsc.edu/billingcomplia...rocedures.aspx
    It's a good resource to model your plan after. Hope that helps!

  3. #3
    Location
    Ellenville, New York
    Posts
    1,176
    Default Thank you!
    Brandi, the policy and procedure from TTU is fantastic - thank you! I really like the points system for different types of errors - would also help "sell" a 95 percent threshold for points or even 100% if the mistake is not the MD/coder. I also bookmarked the site for other helpful documents.

    You and some other very helpful people (Pam, Tessa, Deborah, etc) are why I visit this forum frequently - thanks again!

  4. #4
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by MnTwins29 View Post
    Brandi, the policy and procedure from TTU is fantastic - thank you! I really like the points system for different types of errors - would also help "sell" a 95 percent threshold for points or even 100% if the mistake is not the MD/coder. I also bookmarked the site for other helpful documents.

    You and some other very helpful people (Pam, Tessa, Deborah, etc) are why I visit this forum frequently - thanks again!
    Thanks! I thought the points system was awesome, too - it doesn't quite fit perfectly with our company's structure (since we're not a teaching hospital, as they are), but it's good enough to use as a template to design your own policy. Did you get a chance to read their notes on EMR defaults? Great stuff...

    I think that they had a run-in with the OIG a few years ago, and their compliance program's robust-ness came out of that. Anyways...glad I could help!

Similar Threads

  1. coding accuracy rate
    By kevbshields in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-19-2013, 08:43 AM
  2. DRG Rate Question
    By cleanclaims in forum Medicare Regulations
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-14-2012, 05:31 PM
  3. Coding accuracy rate
    By MnTwins29 in forum Compliance General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-13-2012, 08:55 AM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-02-2009, 11:52 AM
  5. Audit question
    By abill_423 in forum E/M
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-24-2008, 10:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.