This may sound like a ridiculous question to some of you, but this has become a dilema with my organization and I need guidance, please.
In terms of billing, I understand that there are some payers out there that will not credential or recongize a mid-level provider and in order to report those services we have to bill under the supervising physican and append the modifier SA so the payer will process the claim correctly and the carrier will reimburse at the correct level (usually 85%). Now the problem, my organization is asking if we can apply this methodology to all mid-level providers. Meaning can we bill all mid-level providers under the supervising physican and append the SA modifier across the board, or do would we open ourselves up to potential denials? Legalities? We do understand that Medicare does not accept the SA modifier. My understanding of the reimbursement process is that if the provider is credentialed with the payer and has his/her own number, you are to bill that provider under his/her own number.
So, can anyone advise me on this issue, please? I think we can't do this across the board, but I am getting pushback. All thoughts appreciated.
- ICD-10 Training
- Exam Preparation
- CPC (Certified Professional Coder)
- COC (Certified Outpatient Coder)
- CIC (Certified Inpatient Coder) NEW!
- CRC (Certified Risk Adjustment Coder) NEW!
- CPB (Certified Professional Biller)
- CPMA (Certified Professional Medical Auditor)
- CDEO (Certified Documentation Expert – Outpatient) NEW!
- CPPM (Certified Physician Practice Manager)
- CPCO (Certified Professional Compliance Officer)
- VIEW ALL CERTIFICATIONS
Coding / Billing Solutions
- Audit / Compliance Solutions
Job Experience / Apprentice Removal
News / Discussion
- Other Resources
- Book Store
- Log In / Join