AAPC - Back to school
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: V71.1

  1. #1

    Default V71.1

    AAPC: Back to School
    We saw a patient who had a lung lesion and a skull lesion. Feeling that probably something is going on and looking for something to biopsy... we ordered CT Brain, neck, chest. I think the neck would not pass, so we used lung/skull lesion and V717.1. However I was dinged from our quality department on using V71.1.
    Observation codes are to be used if there are no signs or symptoms and I think nodules and lesions are signs and symptoms. And it is not a stand alone code. Here is what coding guidelines say: “V67.00, V67.1, V67.2, and V71.1 are non-specific ICD-9 codes, which require an additional ICD-9-CM code to specify the disease entity treated.”
    I thought you could use V71.1 when you were suspicious that cancer was involved?
    Please help me understand this code.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Columbia, MO


    V71.1 is for a suspected malignant neoplasm not found. You must use the heading in the V71 category as part of the descriptor for each code in the category, this is not for a suspicion of malignancy but for when there was a suspicion that was not found to be a malignancy. V71 codes are all first listed only allowed. I am not sure where you are reading the coding guideline you pulled, but V71 codes are not non specific ICD-9 codes and do not require an additional code. You ususally use a secondary with the V71.1 to show what the finding was such a benign neoplasm,but you must have a path report that shows no malignancy to use V71.1

    Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Bettendorf, Iowa


    V71.1 is principal dx only but it is rarely used and a circumstance that calls for it would kinda tricky. You would use it for a patient being observed for a suspected condition, without signs or symptoms, that has been ruled out (i.e mitchellde's reference to having this documented via path).

    With the information you shared, my best advice would be to not use the V71.1 at all. Your patient is not without signs or symptoms, he/she has lesions. I suspect the physicians documentation would have additional signs and/or symptoms you could reference.
    Ruth Long CPC,CHONC

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Hartford, CT


    Ruth can we use v71.1 on pet scans? we are getting denials without?
    Pat A. Trautner, CCS/CPC/CEDC/CHONC

Similar Threads

  1. use of V71.1
    By JMGEYER in forum Hematology/Oncology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-16-2010, 09:57 AM
  2. V71.1 Suspected Neoplasm
    By JMGEYER in forum Hematology/Oncology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-18-2010, 05:19 PM
  3. V71.4 mva dx
    By MsMaddy in forum Family Practice
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-30-2009, 11:14 AM
  4. V71.4 observation following accident
    By kathylouwho in forum Interventional Radiology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 12:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.