Results 1 to 8 of 8

Please help settle a debate!

  1. #1
    Default Please help settle a debate!
    Exam Training Packages
    I was asked to pose this question to you to try to settle a debate in our office.

    The date of service is in 2010 and the patient presents to the physician's office with a laceration. The laceration is repaired and the patient receives a tetanus shot. Are the office visit, the laceration repair and the tetanus shot all payable?

    I know what I think, but I don't have a horse in the race

    Thanks!

    Karen

  2. #2
    Location
    Lafayette, LA
    Posts
    24
    Default Debate
    Actually the horse that wins is "yes". If the patient notes support modifiers 25 for the E/M and the doctor documents the lac repair and the tetnus you may recieve payment .
    Belinda Keeling, CPC, CANPC

  3. #3
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,126
    Default
    This is often a debated subject but I'll give my two cents-

    If the office visit was not above and beyond the care inherent to repair the wound, I would say the laceration repair only w/ the tetanus shot; meaning a separate, identifiable E/M.

    " Medicare payments for medical procedures include payments for certain evaluation and management (E/M) services that are necessary prior to the performance of a procedure. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) does not normally allow additional payments for separate E/M services performed by a provider on the same day as a
    procedure. However, if a provider performs an E/M service on the same day as a procedure that is significant, separately identifiable, and above and beyond the usual preoperative and postoperative care associated with the procedure, modifier 25 may be attached to the claim to allow additional payment for the separate E/M service."

    http://www.oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-03-00470.pdf

  4. #4
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Posts
    886
    Default
    Rebecca, if I understand correctly, you would list the laceration repair with the tetanus shot and would NOT list the EM code. Would you completely leave it out, OR code it without the modifier knowing that it will be bundled? Just solidifying the basics once again...

    Suzanne E. Byrum CPC

  5. #5
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,126
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by ollielooya View Post
    Rebecca, if I understand correctly, you would list the laceration repair with the tetanus shot and would NOT list the EM code. Would you completely leave it out, OR code it without the modifier knowing that it will be bundled? Just solidifying the basics once again...

    Suzanne E. Byrum CPC
    Depending on the documentation...If there isn't a separate, identifiable reason for the E/M, I would not report it. There will be cases when there is a separate issue at hand but if it's obvious that there are no other problems, complaints, I would only report the repair and the tetanus. I'm absolutley of the mind set that the provider is entitled to receiving max reimbursement but I also caution against voluminous documentation to achieve an E/M if not warranted.

  6. #6
    Location
    Kansas City, MO
    Posts
    431
    Default
    I completely agree with Rebecca. The E/M documentation would have to show as "above and beyond" to be billed in addition to the procedure which has an E/M component built in.
    Linda Vargas, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CPC-I, CEMC,CCC
    PMCC Licensed Instructor
    Kansas City, MO Chapter
    President, 2018
    Vice President, 2017
    Member Development Officer 2016
    Harrisonville, MO Chapter President - 2013
    ICD-10 Education Coordinator- 2012
    Chapter President - 2011
    President Elect - 2010

  7. #7
    Default
    This is always a big debate.

    I would have to see the documentation to be absolutely certain per the case, but the way I see this from what you have posted, yes. The reason is the patient came in with the laceration, the patient had to be evaluated and assesed before the decision was made if it needed or how it needed to be repaired.

    If the patient had come in say the day before with the laceration and the provider felt it didn't need repair, but than the patient came back in the next day or a few days later due to the laceration not healing and the decision was made to repair at the time, I would say no E/M only the procedure.

    or, say the patient was seen by another provider for the laceration and than was sent to your office for the repair, than I would also say no E/M, unless your provider had to evaluate another complaint. The reason for the visit to your office was for the repair of the laceration, so the evaluation prior to the repair would be included in the repair.

  8. #8
    Location
    Chesapeake, Virginia
    Posts
    16
    Default
    Rebecca,

    What would you consider usual pre-operative care for this patient? I would have agreed with tuliphaven that an initial assessment of the patient and plan for treatment (the lac repair) would have appropriated the E/M. Your comment, however, has me second guessing. This is such a gray area, if there are some specific guidelines, outside of the definition for modifier 25, I would sure like to read them.

Similar Threads

  1. help settle this debate
    By perkins05 in forum E/M
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-11-2013, 10:44 AM
  2. Please settle disagreement
    By lisammy in forum Cardiology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-19-2012, 02:18 PM
  3. help settle discussion
    By perkins05 in forum E/M
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-12-2011, 10:06 AM
  4. Please settle this for me!!!
    By colleensso in forum Billing/Reimbursement
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-25-2011, 03:10 AM
  5. Please settle this for me!
    By colleensso in forum ENT/Otolaryngology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-23-2011, 09:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.