Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

AMA Voting down ICD-10?

  1. #11
    Louisville, KY
    Medical Coding Books
    This is a little bit hysterical on the AMA's part. (I use the word hysterical intentionally.) Point being, the comment period was over a long, long time ago. Is anyone even listening?

    Also, AMA's message got notice. AHIMA posted this shortly thereafter:

  2. #12
    New Haven, CT
    Default Fred...
    It wasn't me bemoaning the fact that I'd have to learn. It was just alarming that the AMA voted it down now, when it has been in process for years. My point was what would the impact be? That's it. Please don't make it out to be something it's not. Thanks!
    Meegan Sweeney, CPC-A

  3. #13
    Charlotte, NC

    Sorry you thought I was singling you out. That's not it at all. I even stated my opinion was to the "general audience" not anyone in particular.

  4. #14
    Tacoma, WA
    Quote Originally Posted by msweeney76 View Post
    Thanks for the info, but here is an article on the official AMA website. I think if physicians gang together, there might be trouble between them and the WHO.

    I'm not saying that I wouldn't learn...but jsut wanted to see what was happening and if the AAPC reacted yet.
    LIke all the others have is far too little too late to stop this ball from rolling!! The AAPC did a whole letter writing campaign a few years ago which helped to get the implementation date moved to 2013, but this is going to happen whether the AMA likes it or not at this point.
    Arlene J. Smith, CPC, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC

  5. #15
    Concord, NC or Rochester, NY
    Too bad they do not listen to those that are in the industry. I am originally from Canada and still have roots there so I deal with the medical system. To this day there is not one piece of evidence that ICD-10 will benefit patients and there is a great deal of evidence that countries that have implemented are still having difficulties with it.

    It may seem to late to change course because of the cost. Also being a CPA I would say it is time to cut the losses as the billions yet to be spent will do nothing to improve health of patients.

    Let's worry about the general health and improvement and not a reporting system that seems to do nothing to help.

    Let's see - in the US if we implement, we will already be several versions behind other countries - makes no sense to me.

  6. Default
    AMA was very opinionated, if I may, last week in Chicago at the AHIMA convention about ICD-10, and they are powerful, but not as powerful as CMS who is backing ICD-10 totally.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. AMA Tells CMS To Stop ICD-10 Implementation
    By dballard2004 in forum ICD-10
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-09-2013, 06:39 PM
  2. AMA Proposes Delaying ICD-10 To 2015
    By dballard2004 in forum ICD-10
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-31-2012, 11:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.