Results 1 to 4 of 4


  1. #1
    Default HPI vs PMH
    Medical Coding Books
    Our practice has an Endocrinologist and his is billing all of his follow up visits as 99214's. When doing the review he is lacking any history (as I see it) but a co-worker thinks we can count the review of the patients logs as PMH. When the provider documents :
    His last A1C was 7.1% and I know that about two years ago he was in the high 8% range so he really has made a lot of progress:

    Reviewed patients logs for the last 4 weeks and tends to be about 150 to 160 at lunch and is over 200 at supper and bedtime.

    I count these either as reviewing labs or timing in the HPI, however my co-worker thinks that we could count these as PMH.

    Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.
    Stephanie Livingston, CPC

  2. #2
    Evansville Indiana
    To bill a 99214, he doesn't have to have any history as long as he meets the requirements with the exam and MDM.

  3. #3
    I'm sorry I should have specified that his PE meets a detailed exam but his decision making only meets low complexity.
    Stephanie Livingston, CPC

  4. #4
    Milwaukee WI
    Default You need a DETAILED history
    So you need a DETAILED history?

    To get that you need
    1) 4 elements of HPI / or the status of 3 chronic conditions (if you are following 1997 guidelines, or if your carrier allows you to use this with the 1995 guidelines)

    IF you have #1, .... THEN ...

    2) you need at least 2 systems reviewed of the 14

    IF you have #1 AND #2, .... THEN ...

    3) you need at least one item of PFSH

    You state he is lacking any history ...
    If that is absolutely true than I don't see how you can squeeze out a detailed history from the little example you give. However ... if what you mean is that he has not documented a past medical, social or family history ....

    I MIGHT be persuaded to count a statement about reviewing status of the patient's condition from 2 years ago as past medical history, though really I'd much rather count this as ROS.

    A better option would be to train your physician to always include a social history - alcohol and tobacco use (or lack thereof). This is medically relevant to the patient's condition and will satisfy the documentation requirement for at least one element of PFSH. (Won't help with getting an HPI and ROS, but that's another story.)

    Hope that helps.

    F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC

Similar Threads

  1. PMH criteria
    By Lynda Wetter in forum E/M
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-11-2014, 09:23 AM
  2. Coding from the PMH?
    By nikita0872 in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-09-2014, 12:38 PM
  3. Chronic conditions and PMH
    By BelkisE in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-16-2014, 08:39 AM
  4. Pmh
    By slivingston in forum E/M
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-08-2012, 02:47 PM
  5. Using PMH for ROS?
    By coder25 in forum E/M
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-05-2009, 11:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.