Results 1 to 4 of 4

Copy of CPT Assisstant

  1. #1
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    1,166
    Default Copy of CPT Assisstant
    Medical Coding Books
    Does anyone have a copy of the article on cerumen removal from CPT Assisstant, July 2005 nearby? I have a question regarding the article. Does the article say that the cerumen has to be removed by the physician?
    Last edited by dballard2004; 08-15-2008 at 06:51 PM.
    Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P, CPC-P, CRHC, AAPC Fellow
    Coder

  2. #2
    Location
    ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
    Posts
    2,338
    Default
    I dont have a hard copy of the CPT assistant but I do have Encoder Pro and I can copy and paste it into an e-mail and send it to you that way. Send me a private message with your e-mail info and the CPT code/CPT assistant reference and I'll do that for you.

    Mary

  3. #3
    Location
    ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
    Posts
    2,338
    Default I think this is the one you are looking for
    Surgery: Auditory System

    In collaboration with the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS), we present the following discussion which provides some typical coding scenarios with regard to the appropriate use and application of CPT codes related to ear wax removal:

    1. The patient presents to the office for the removal of “ear wax” by the nurse via irrigation or lavage.

    2. The patient presents to the office for the removal of “ear wax” by the primary care physician via irrigation or lavage.

    3. The patient presents to the office for “ear wax” removal as the presenting complaint. This is described as impacted cerumen because it completely covers the eardrum and the patient has hearing loss. The impacted cerumen is removed by the primary care physician or otolaryngologist with magnification provided by an otoscope or operating microscope and instruments such as wax curettes, forceps, and suction.

    Question:Are these procedures appropriately reported with CPT code 69210, Removal impacted cerumen (separate procedure), one or both ears?

    AMA Comment: A major element in determining whether code 69210 should be reported is understanding the definition of impacted cerumen. By definition of the AAO-HNS, “If any one or more of the following are pre-sent, cerumen should be considered ‘impacted' clinically:

    Visual considerations: Cerumen impairs exam of clinically significant portions of the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, or middle ear condition.
    Qualitative considerations: Extremely hard, dry, irritative cerumen causing symptoms such as pain, itching, hearing loss, etc.
    Inflammatory considerations: Associated with foul odor, infection, or dermatitis.
    Quantitative considerations: Obstructive, copious cerumen that cannot be removed without magnification and multiple instrumentations requiring physician skills.”
    Other issues may also require consideration. Removing wax that is not impacted does not warrant the reporting of CPT code 69210. Rather, that work would appropriately be captured by an evaluation and management (E/M) code regardless of how it is removed. If, however, the wax is truly impacted, then its removal should be reported with 69210 if performed by a physician using at minimum an otoscope and instruments such as wax curettes or, in the case of many otolaryngologists, with an operating microscope and suction plus specific ear instruments (eg, cup forceps, right angles). Accompanying documentation should indicate the time, effort, and equipment required to provide the service. Add-on code 69990, Microsurgical techniques, requiring use of operating microscope (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), should not be reported if the operating microscope is used for cerumen removal. In this later instance, however, code 92504, Binocular microscopy (separate diagnostic procedure), may be reported.

    Therefore, based on this information, scenarios 1 and 2 would not be reported with code 69210. These scenarios would be captured by the appropriate E/M code. Scenario 3, however, should be reported with code 69210 because both criteria were met; the patient had cerumen impaction and the removal required physician work using at least an otoscope and instrumentation rather than simple lavage.

  4. #4
    Location
    Overland Park, KS
    Posts
    1,166
    Default
    This is it! Thanks.
    Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P, CPC-P, CRHC, AAPC Fellow
    Coder

Similar Threads

  1. 0256T (2012) Need copy of CPT changes
    By kbritt77 in forum Cardiology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-04-2013, 05:06 PM
  2. Searchable copy of all of the CPT guidelines?
    By tracey_meissel in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-12-2010, 06:29 AM
  3. HARD COPY ICD-9 & CPT BOOKS vs. Online resources
    By sambone in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-11-2008, 03:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.