AAPC - August DL Sale: 50% OFF
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Punch Biopsy - If the provider does

  1. #1

    Default Punch Biopsy - If the provider does

    If the provider does a punch biopsy but removes the entire lesion with the punch would this be coded as an excision because he removed the entire lesion or would it still be a punch biopsy 11100 since that was the manner in which it was removed?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ekarsky@aqreva.com View Post
    If the provider does a punch biopsy but removes the entire lesion with the punch would this be coded as an excision because he removed the entire lesion or would it still be a punch biopsy 11100 since that was the manner in which it was removed?
    Good question...

    My initial instinct was to say 'biopsy', since you mentioned the punch biopsy - I could've sworn that the CPT descriptions, or guidelines, mentioned that by name, but I can't find it anywhere, now.

    In fact, neither the biopsy or excision codes really mention surgical method(s), except to say that 'shaving of lesions', has its own section of codes. The guidelines under excision state:
    "Excision is defined as full-thickness (through the dermis) removal of a lesion, including margins, and includes simple closure when performed...Code selection is determined by measuring the greatest clinical diameter of the apparent lesion plus that margin required for complete excision..." - No approach/method is mentioned.

    The biopsy guidelines make it pretty clear, that an excision includes a biopsy, but a biopsy doesn't necessarily include an excision. My interpretation of the rules, is that the biopsy codes are used, when only a sample is being taken to send to pathology, and excision codes are for when the whole lesion is removed (and, when needed, sent to pathology).

    If the whole lesion was taken, and the provider documented the size w/margins correctly, I'd say go with the excision code, for 3 reasons:
    1. The method of removal ('punch biopsy') doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in the CPT guidelines or descriptions, that I could find. (If it's in there, someone please tell me where to find it, because now it's gonna bug me!)
    2. Regardless of what method was used, it accomplished the same thing as a scalpel excision (assuming it was documented properly, of course) - the whole lesion is gone, and is being sent to pathology.
    3. The provider would be short-changing themselves on reimbursement, since biopsy codes are paid at a much lower rate (which is probably because they have the potential to lead to an excision, later on - if my "biopsy = sample" theory is correct.) If he accomplished the work of an excision, then he should be reimbursed, accordingly.

    That's just my opinion, though - I'd be interested to see what others think about this one.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    12,068

    Default

    The punch is just a tool that takes small samples , sometime the lesion is so small that the puch can remove the entire lesion, and they always go full thickness, this is a punch excision and should be coded as an excision, it is unfortunate the provider uses the term punch biopsy.

    Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    1,156

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by btadlock1 View Post
    Good question...

    My initial instinct was to say 'biopsy', since you mentioned the punch biopsy - I could've sworn that the CPT descriptions, or guidelines, mentioned that by name, but I can't find it anywhere, now.

    In fact, neither the biopsy or excision codes really mention surgical method(s), except to say that 'shaving of lesions', has its own section of codes. The guidelines under excision state:
    "Excision is defined as full-thickness (through the dermis) removal of a lesion, including margins, and includes simple closure when performed...Code selection is determined by measuring the greatest clinical diameter of the apparent lesion plus that margin required for complete excision..." - No approach/method is mentioned.

    The biopsy guidelines make it pretty clear, that an excision includes a biopsy, but a biopsy doesn't necessarily include an excision. My interpretation of the rules, is that the biopsy codes are used, when only a sample is being taken to send to pathology, and excision codes are for when the whole lesion is removed (and, when needed, sent to pathology).

    If the whole lesion was taken, and the provider documented the size w/margins correctly, I'd say go with the excision code, for 3 reasons:
    1. The method of removal ('punch biopsy') doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in the CPT guidelines or descriptions, that I could find. (If it's in there, someone please tell me where to find it, because now it's gonna bug me!)
    2. Regardless of what method was used, it accomplished the same thing as a scalpel excision (assuming it was documented properly, of course) - the whole lesion is gone, and is being sent to pathology.
    3. The provider would be short-changing themselves on reimbursement, since biopsy codes are paid at a much lower rate (which is probably because they have the potential to lead to an excision, later on - if my "biopsy = sample" theory is correct.) If he accomplished the work of an excision, then he should be reimbursed, accordingly.

    That's just my opinion, though - I'd be interested to see what others think about this one.

    Brandi,

    Here is a little info about punch biopsies:

    Punch biopsy


    Q:Is CPT code 11100 appropriate for any size punch biopsy (3 mm to 8 mm)?

    A: Yes. Code 11100 may be reported for a single or first biopsy, regardless of size. However, you should always consider location. If a punch biopsy is taken of certain areas, such as the lip (40490), external ear (69100) or eyelid (67810), it is appropriate to report the code for that specific body area.

    (from this link: http://www.aafp.org/fpm/2010/0500/p35.html )

    This article from the same site has a little more info also:

    http://www.aafp.org/fpm/2005/1000/p47.html
    Meagan Strauss, CPC, CEMC
    Coding Coordinator
    The NeuroMedical Center
    Baton Rouge, LA

  5. #5

    Default Punch biopsy vs biopsy

    I'm a little confused between a biopsy (11100) vs codes in the 11300-11313 range. I have an Ingenix CPT that states shave excision/elliptical excision/punch biopsies should be coded under 11300-11313? That's how I've been coding the punch biopsy. Am I incorrect?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kmwyllie550@aol.com View Post
    I'm a little confused between a biopsy (11100) vs codes in the 11300-11313 range. I have an Ingenix CPT that states shave excision/elliptical excision/punch biopsies should be coded under 11300-11313? That's how I've been coding the punch biopsy. Am I incorrect?
    11100 is just a biopsy - by any method (punch biopsies are usually coded here). The purpose of 11100 is only to take a sample of the lesion, for pathologic examination.

    11300-11313 are shave removals. They include a "biopsy", but the purpose is to remove the whole lesion - not just a piece of it. Shave removals are used for lesions that don't extend beyond the dermis. (you might think of them as 'Shallow' lesions). You don't have to send the lesion for pathologic examination, but if you do, it's included in the CPT code.

    Excisions (11400-11646), differ from shave removals, in that they are the full-thickness removal of lesions (eg, through the subcutaneous tissue...for removal of 'Deep' lesions). These take margins into account in their diameter-measurements, and include a simple repair (sutures, chemical or electrocauterization of wounds, etc.) They are also classified by 'benign' or 'malignant' - neither shave removals or biopsies include a 'malignancy' aspect (if you already know it's malignant, there's no need to send it to pathology - you'd just cut the whole thing out...)

    Make sense?

  7. #7

    Default Thanks, Brandi

    This helps a lot.

Similar Threads

  1. Punch biopsy or Punch excision
    By BlakeCarswell82 in forum Dermatology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2014, 06:45 AM
  2. punch biopsy
    By Asmith2284 in forum Dermatology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-12-2014, 08:06 AM
  3. Punch biopsy
    By Love Coding! in forum E/M
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 04:36 PM
  4. punch biopsy
    By codecrazy in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-30-2009, 12:18 PM
  5. Punch Biopsy - How do you code punch biopsies?
    By kathymoon in forum Dermatology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-13-2007, 07:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.