Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 790.21 vs. 790.6 Elevated Fasting Glucose and Medicare

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Malone
    Posts
    359

    Default 790.21 vs. 790.6 Elevated Fasting Glucose and Medicare

    ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting I would like some feedback from other coders about how they would code a dx of elevated glucose as indicated by a lab value of >90 as part of a CMP. In the past, I have coded these as 790.21 in absence of a dx of DM, however, the following seems to lean towards 790.6. Any thoughts on this?



    Medicare National Coverage
    Determinations (NCD)
    Coding Policy Manual and Change Report
    July 2008


    190.20 – Blood Glucose Testing
    1. A diagnostic statement of impaired glucose tolerance must be evaluated in the context of the documentation in the medical record in order to assign the most accurate ICD-9-CM code. An abnormally elevated fasting blood glucose level in the absence of the diagnosis of diabetes is classified to Code 790.6 - other abnormal blood chemistry. If the provider bases the diagnostic statement of impaired glucose tolerance” on an abnormal glucose tolerance test, the condition is classified to 790.2 -- normal glucose tolerance test. Both conditions are considered indications for ordering glycated hemoglobin or glycated protein testing in the absence of the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
    Heather Winters, CPC, CFPC

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Posts
    1,135

    Default

    If the dx is for elevated or abnormal glucose - I code 790.29
    If it's for impaired fasting glucose I code - 790.21
    but, apparently from what you wrote, I shouldn't code the 790.21 for impaired fasting glucose UNLESS they have a dx of DM. I'll have to keep my eye out for that when it comes through!
    {that's my opinion on the posted matter}
    Donna, CPC, CPC-H

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Milwaukee WI
    Posts
    4,453

    Default The way I read it ...

    Don't you just love when bureaucrats try to write a definitive statement?

    Okay, let's tear this apart and try to figure out what they are saying ...

    "An abnormally elevated fasting blood glucose level in the absence of the diagnosis of diabetes is classified to Code 790.6 - other abnormal blood chemistry." Seems clear enough ... if there is no dx of DM, you use 790.6

    BUT ..."If the provider bases the diagnostic statement of impaired glucose tolerance on an abnormal glucose tolerance test, the condition is classified to 790.2 -- normal glucose tolerance test." ... so, if there is not dx of DM, BUT the provider does have "a diagnostic statement of impaired glucose tolerance," then you use 790.2x (you need a 5th digit) ... so we're back to 790.21.

    Seems to use anything other than 790.6 the MD has to at least state there is impaired glucose tolerance. That's my interpretation ...

    F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CPC-E/M

Similar Threads

  1. Fasting Glucose
    By francotti@aol.com in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-22-2013, 10:37 PM
  2. 790.6 vs 794.8
    By dawns1316 in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-03-2012, 07:51 AM
  3. 790.21
    By heatherwinters in forum Diagnosis Coding
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-22-2012, 11:09 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •