Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

ER physician problem

  1. Default ER physician problem
    Medical Coding Books
    I'm having a problem with a few of my ER doctors wanting to use "fall without injury" as a primary diagnosis. We have tried to explain to them that this is not a diagnosis, but rather the act or cause of an injury. We have tried to explain to them that we could use a "worried-well" code or other "V" code for observation after accident. They just don't seem to get it when we try to explain this to them, and continue to write "fall" as their diagnosis. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to handle this? Thanks.

  2. #2
    Location
    Milwaukee WI
    Posts
    4,466
    Default Feared Complaint, Not Found
    Are they filling out a charge sheet, or are you coding from documentation? In either case, keep plugging away at trying to educate the docs on codable diagnosis (ICD-10 will be even MORE specific).

    I'd probably use V65.5 Person w/ feared complaint in whom no diagnosis was made -and- E888.9 (or other E code if I knew specifics of fall).

    F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CPC-E/M

  3. Default E Codes
    I would take my ICD-9 book to the doctors and show them on page 23, #19 of the coding guidelines where it states "E codes are to never be recorded as principal diagnoses". Let the conversation go from there and you can then guide them to the correct primary diagnosis.
    ~Amy, CPC, CPMA, CEMC~
    Auditor/Consultant

  4. Default
    Can E Codes be used as an admitting diagnosis? For example, patient presents to the ER due to motorcycle accident (E code) complaining of back and neck pain. Would the back and neck pain be the admitiing diagnosis? Or would the MVA be the admitting diagnosis or would both be the admitting diagnosis? Is it possible/allowable to have more than one admitting diagnosis in the ER?

  5. Default
    Quote Originally Posted by msbrowning View Post
    Can E Codes be used as an admitting diagnosis? For example, patient presents to the ER due to motorcycle accident (E code) complaining of back and neck pain. Would the back and neck pain be the admitiing diagnosis? Or would the MVA be the admitting diagnosis or would both be the admitting diagnosis? Is it possible/allowable to have more than one admitting diagnosis in the ER?
    Your injury codes, neck and back pain would be listed first, then the E codes would be added to identify the nature and the place of the accident. Please look at your ICD-9 guidelines as I stated above, it paints a clear picture of using E codes.
    ~Amy, CPC, CPMA, CEMC~
    Auditor/Consultant

  6. Default
    When coding IVP's for the ER, is it necessary to use the HCPCS book to identify the drug that was given, for example patient was given an IVP with Zofran at 10:30 pm? I did code the IVP as 90774. Also, if the patient was given Zofran at 10:30 pm and then again at 2:30 am, do I code it as 90774 x 2 or would I code it as 90774, 90775 or would I code it as 90774, 90776?

    At first I thought 90774, 90775 but 90775 states each additional seqeuntial intravenous push of a new substance/drug, but since it is the same drug, Zofran, I am unsure if this is the correct code.

    Now 90776 states each additonal sequential intravenous push of the same substance/drug provided in a facility (List seperately in addition to code for primary procedure), so being that the Zofran is the same drug that I coded in 90774, would I code the additional push as 90776? Now if the patient was given the IVP with Zofran at 3 different times, how would I code it, 90774, 90776 x 2?

    Also, how would I code an IV that was started in the field and monitored in the ER, if I code it at all. For example, patient arrived at the ER via helicopter at 815 am (motorcycle accident) IV was started in the field, pt was given an IVP of Zofran at 10:15 am and another one at 2:15 pm. Before patient was discharged IV was noted to still be running. Do I code the IV and the IVP or just the IVP?

    Thanks in advance

  7. #7
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by msbrowning View Post
    When coding IVP's for the ER, is it necessary to use the HCPCS book to identify the drug that was given, for example patient was given an IVP with Zofran at 10:30 pm? I did code the IVP as 90774. Also, if the patient was given Zofran at 10:30 pm and then again at 2:30 am, do I code it as 90774 x 2 or would I code it as 90774, 90775 or would I code it as 90774, 90776?

    At first I thought 90774, 90775 but 90775 states each additional seqeuntial intravenous push of a new substance/drug, but since it is the same drug, Zofran, I am unsure if this is the correct code.

    Now 90776 states each additonal sequential intravenous push of the same substance/drug provided in a facility (List seperately in addition to code for primary procedure), so being that the Zofran is the same drug that I coded in 90774, would I code the additional push as 90776? Now if the patient was given the IVP with Zofran at 3 different times, how would I code it, 90774, 90776 x 2?

    Also, how would I code an IV that was started in the field and monitored in the ER, if I code it at all. For example, patient arrived at the ER via helicopter at 815 am (motorcycle accident) IV was started in the field, pt was given an IVP of Zofran at 10:15 am and another one at 2:15 pm. Before patient was discharged IV was noted to still be running. Do I code the IV and the IVP or just the IVP?

    Thanks in advance
    For the first question, we do not charge for the drug, the pharmacy does that. You would code 90774 and 90776 for Zofran for 10:30 and 2:30. If Zofran is given at 3 different times as long as there is at least 30 minutes between pushes, you would code 90774 90776x2.
    Only code what is done in your ED dept. If a drug is infusing when you receive a patient, you can start the clock when the patient is admitted to your ED. If Zofran was given at 10:15 in the field and you gave it at 2:15, then I would only code 90774 for the 2:15 push.
    That is my opinion on this question.

  8. Default
    Ok, so if the IV was started in the field and the ER administered the IVP (meds through the IV that was started in the field), I only code the IVP? So, can I just eliminate the fact that the IV was started in the field because my ER physician or nurse did not start it?

    Also, if a patient receives two different procedures in the Er, for example an IVP and a CT, do I need to use a modfier?

    Is there a certain modifier that is always used in the ER regardless of the procedure or procedures that are billed? I guess what I am asking is, is there one modifier that should be attached to every procedure that I code in the ER?
    Last edited by msbrowning; 09-21-2008 at 09:53 PM.

  9. Default
    Quote Originally Posted by okiesawyers View Post
    Your injury codes, neck and back pain would be listed first, then the E codes would be added to identify the nature and the place of the accident. Please look at your ICD-9 guidelines as I stated above, it paints a clear picture of using E codes.
    Hi Amy,
    Thanks for responding, I would like to ask you a question since you are an auditor. How do I choose the E/M level in the ER. For example if a pregnant patients present to the ER with vaginal bleeding, would i could that as a 99284 or a 99285? What about a burn patient with 25% or 30 % third degree burns?

  10. Default
    Quote Originally Posted by msbrowning View Post
    Hi Amy,
    Thanks for responding, I would like to ask you a question since you are an auditor. How do I choose the E/M level in the ER. For example if a pregnant patients present to the ER with vaginal bleeding, would i could that as a 99284 or a 99285? What about a burn patient with 25% or 30 % third degree burns?
    Hi Ms Browning,
    It's still going to all depend on your documentation. I still use my audit tool to circle all the information from the note, then I look in the CPT book for the definitions of the ER codes, note that all ER codes must meet 3 out of the 3 in order to qualify for the highest level. In the MDM you could almost always use a 3 or 4 in Box A due to it more than likely being a new problem. The problem that I have found with doctors in the ER is not enough documented examination, which will bring down your overall E&M since 3 out of the 3 must be met. Let me know if you need anything else. I am also going to PM you!
    Good luck,
    Amy
    ~Amy, CPC, CPMA, CEMC~
    Auditor/Consultant

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. New problem or Established problem worsening
    By chriskhans in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-02-2015, 01:29 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-23-2014, 09:41 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-19-2013, 03:20 PM
  4. New problem or estblished problem to examiner
    By PKellogg in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 02:18 PM
  5. New Problem vs Est. Problem
    By scronkhite in forum E/M
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-07-2009, 03:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.