Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 90465 & 90467

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    67

    Default 90465 & 90467

    I have a pediatrician that states he has heard that CPT codes 90465 and 90467 were changing, and that "immunization administration younger than 8 years of age" would no longer apply and that the patient could be any age.
    Any one have any knowledge of this or changes coming for 2009?
    Please advise.
    Thanks
    C. Robinson, RT, CPC

  2. #2

    Default

    I'm not sure about this, but do you happen to know if the 90465 can be used with a nurse practitioner billing incident to the physician?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    12

    Default 90465,90467

    What does the "face-to-face" counsel during administration consist of? Does provider have to be present when the nurse is giving vaccine? Can provider just tell pt. recommended vaccines and ask if any questions?
    thnks
    Jenny Almond, CPC

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jlalmond View Post
    What does the "face-to-face" counsel during administration consist of? Does provider have to be present when the nurse is giving vaccine? Can provider just tell pt. recommended vaccines and ask if any questions?
    thnks
    It does not say the physician has to administer the vaccine, just counsel..... just my take on it.
    Barbara Haskins CPC

  5. #5

    Default Clarification on 90465/90466

    So the only way to use these 2 codes is if the physician counsels on them, right? If they do not counsel, one should bill 90471-4 even if the patient is age 8 or below?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,128

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cynthiar View Post
    I have a pediatrician that states he has heard that CPT codes 90465 and 90467 were changing, and that "immunization administration younger than 8 years of age" would no longer apply and that the patient could be any age.
    Any one have any knowledge of this or changes coming for 2009?
    Please advise.
    Thanks
    C. Robinson, RT, CPC
    Is this what you're looking for?

    http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/200...3/hll21013.htm

  7. #7

    Default

    Not necessarily. I think I was just confused on whether or not 90465/90466 could be used if the physician did not counsel on the vaccines. And also if the doctor actually had to state in the chart that counseling was done.

    I've been searching the web and it seems counseling has to be done and the doctor should state so in records.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,128

    Default

    Medcode...

    I was responding to the 1st post.

  9. #9

    Default

    I'm new. Forgive me! haha

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by medcode12 View Post
    So the only way to use these 2 codes is if the physician counsels on them, right? If they do not counsel, one should bill 90471-4 even if the patient is age 8 or below?
    You've got it... you can bill 90471-4 for any age but 90465-8 is more appropriate to code if the child is under 8 and the physician talks to the parents on that day about the vaccine (risks, benefits, etc).

    Example: Johnny Doe gets his first Hep A vaccine at the age of 14 months. The Dr. documents that he talked to Johnny's Mom about the risks and benefits of the vaccine. 90465 would be used for the administration of this vaccine. Johnny returns to the office in 6 months for the sole purpose of getting his second Hep A vaccine and the nurse administers the vaccine without the patient seeing the Dr. 90471 would apply to this administration because the physician did not counsel the parent again. (if the parent had questions about the vaccine and the physician did counsel them again the 90465 would apply)

    And Yes if the Dr does not document that he discussed the merits of the vaccine then he didn't do it and you should code the 90471-4.

    Hope this helps!
    Last edited by bhaskins1; 10-10-2008 at 03:29 PM.
    Barbara Haskins CPC

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-07-2015, 12:40 PM
  2. ICD9 allowable coding for 93880 & 83882 & 93875
    By twinger in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-14-2014, 12:09 PM
  3. Documentation for 90465
    By LLovett in forum Pediatrics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-19-2009, 04:05 PM
  4. 90465
    By becca12 in forum Family Practice
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-07-2009, 12:14 AM
  5. When to use the 90465-90468 code range
    By maryanneheath in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 08:40 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.