Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14


  1. #1
    Default Rebundling
    Medical Coding Books
    Can anyone tell me if an insurance company is able to change to codes
    (22845 and 22855) into one code (22849) that we didn't have on our HCFA?

    I don't think that they can, but the insurance representative is fighting me on this one.

    Please help!

  2. #2
    Duluth, Minnesota
    need to see the op report/procedure & to know what was coded - to try to figure out why it's being bundled, especially since 22845 is an add-on code, and 22849(reinsertion) & 22855 (removal) are so different.

    more info needed...
    Donna, CPC, CPC-H

  3. #3
    Well, we billed codes:


    The insurance company then changed 22855 & 22845 into 22849 on our claim form. I am having trouble finding literature stating that this practice is illegal.

  4. #4
    Madison Area Chapter in Madison WI
    I suspect the carrier is accepting the coding as submitted, but is basing the reimbursement on a different code. I am the compliance analyst for a carrier and do not recommend this practice however, it is a standard edit option within editing systems. Although I believe this is technically HIPAA compliant, I personally don't like this practice because I think it is confusing, but it seems to be common practice. I'm interested in hearing from others about this type of situation.
    Happy Coding, Claudia

    Claudia Yoakum-Watson, CPC
    Coding, Compliance, & Reimbursement Solutions
    [email] - website

  5. #5
    North Carolina

    Our surgeon submitted the following CPT codes to the commercial insurance company:



    The insurance company denied CPT codes 22845 and 22855. They re-coded this to 22849 and paid. Why would they re-code these to this CPT?


    While we never like to see a payor change CPT codes, based on how this was submitted, the payor may be right. There are no modifiers on the CPT codes, thus the payor assumed removal and reinsertion at the same level. If this is correct, then 22849 is the correct CPT code. If instrumentation was removed at one level and new instrumentation was placed at a new level, the submitted codes are correct, but modifier 59 would be appended to CPT code 22845 to indicate new instrumentation at a new level.

    Also, review the fee scheduled for these procedures. CPT code 63075 has higher

  6. #6
    Okay, so just to make sure that I'm understanding what everyone is saying, the insurance company is actually allowed to change the codes that we billed to something else, and it is legal? I've never seem a carrier do this, and I've been billing for quite sometime. Does anyone know where I can find literature on whether or not this is a legal practice??


  7. #7
    North Carolina
    I have had similar situations occur in our practice. For example...physician coded the patient as a new patient and the carrier changed the CPT code to an established level they felt was equivalent. UHC is one of those carriers that try this method. Is it right, per I have seen carriers get by with it. I have seen this practice with some of our surgical procedures. Some were justified and some were not...those were appealed. In your scenerio this can be costly especially if the removal and insertion were performed at two different levels. I applaud you for catching and addressing the issue. Many carriers are crossing their fingers with the hopes it will "slip by" the eyes of the coder.

  8. Default
    Working as a bill review for work comp here is our take. Never never change a code that is billed. We may recommend payment based on appropriate coding using override methods but never change what has been issued on the bill. Or, if nothing else can be done call the provider or pend for corrected billing. I too am not sure what the actual rule is regarding changing a code. But, I certainly dont approve of it. Just my 2 cents!

  9. #9
    Speaking as a former Senior Customer Service Professional for one of the large commercial carriers... I can't speak to the legality of it except to say that I don't believe there is a law against it... but I can tell you that if there are two services that should be bundled together into a third code the carrier I worked for would change it. Their take on the situation was that they could either rebundle and pay the claim (1 and done) or they could pay the portion of the claim that was coded correctly, deny payment on the other codes and leave it for the Dr.s office to figure out how to code it correctly. Then when the Dr.s office would call us in customer service, we were not allowed to advise the caller how it should have been coded. Now I'm coding for a pediatrics practice and generally our coding situations are not so complicated here but if I were in your position I would verify if the rebundling is correct, if not I would appeal.

    Just my opinion... hope it helps.
    Barbara Haskins CPC

  10. #10
    Louisville, KY
    To my knowledge it is usually "allowable" practice to rebundle based upon contract language. Because they are the payer, they have not only a right to review documentation, make assessments on the accuracy of a submitted claim, but also to render payment in accordance with those findings.

    One can only hope that the reviewers are at least as knowledgeable as the coder who coded the claim. Hence, the importance of having the CPC-P!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 36415 and Lab CPT codes rebundling - procedures are incidental
    By Anduiza05 in forum Payer/Health Plan
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-12-2013, 09:35 PM
  2. 36415 and Lab CPT Codes rebundling
    By Anduiza05 in forum Employment General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-07-2013, 07:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?


Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.