Results 1 to 5 of 5

cci edits for mod 80

  1. #1
    Question cci edits for mod 80
    Medical Coding Books
    hey everyone,
    I was just wondering about something. If in the CCI edits, it says that a sx is not payable for an assist, would you still code it and bill it out just for the sake of billing, or is that considered incorrect billing?
    I need to get info on this in black and white, please, any help would be great!
    Malama pono,

    Sundae Yomes
    CPC, CPMA, CEMC, CGIC, CGSC, CCS-P

  2. #2
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,126
    Default
    Personally speaking, I post our assistant surgery the same, across the board. This is the protocol/standards developed within our company. I have discovered some carriers will pay for an assistant surgery regardless of CCI edits. Some private payers include language in their provider contracts or provider manuals stating that they follow the NCCI edit guidelines while others use third-party software to edit their claims that use their own logic to determine payment. My rule of thumb...the AMA is your best bet for accurate guidelines and coding conventions.

  3. #3
    Location
    Madison Area Chapter in Madison WI
    Posts
    114
    Default
    I agree. This is a good example of one of the differences in "coding" and "reimbursement" From a coding perspective, it is correct to code for services rendered, eg, the assistant.

    From a reimbursement perspective, some carriers cover it and some don't. Some provider/payer contracts states you need to write off the assistant charges.
    Happy Coding, Claudia


    Claudia Yoakum-Watson, CPC
    Coding, Compliance, & Reimbursement Solutions
    [email]ccrsconsulting@tds.net
    ccrsconsulting.com - website

  4. #4
    Default Food for thought...
    I believe if we are going to throw CCI out the window we should at least take into consideration the very nature of the procedure before we assume it should be reported with an 80 modifier. Some procedures cannot be physically performed by two surgeons. Just because a procedure is listed in the operative report and an assistant surgeon was present it doesn't mean the assist actually assisted on all of the procedures described in the operative note. I would have a dialog with my surgeons before making the assumption that all procedures in their op reports should be billed as assist. Also if you go and look at the procedures that CCI excludes from modifier 80 you will see that many of them are merited for that exact reason.

  5. #5
    Location
    ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
    Posts
    2,338
    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by adwood68 View Post
    I believe if we are going to throw CCI out the window we should at least take into consideration the very nature of the procedure before we assume it should be reported with an 80 modifier. Some procedures cannot be physically performed by two surgeons. Just because a procedure is listed in the operative report and an assistant surgeon was present it doesn't mean the assist actually assisted on all of the procedures described in the operative note. I would have a dialog with my surgeons before making the assumption that all procedures in their op reports should be billed as assist. Also if you go and look at the procedures that CCI excludes from modifier 80 you will see that many of them are merited for that exact reason.
    An "assist" merely means they assisted with the surgery..it doesnt mean that they had to "physically perform" it. The could be holding a retractor and its still an assist.

    I agree with Rebecca and Claudia wholeheartedly. We bill/code all assists across the board regardless of the carrier..even Medicare!!

Similar Threads

  1. Cci edits - have not coded podiatry in
    By MEDCODING in forum Podiatry
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-07-2014, 11:32 PM
  2. Cci Edits / Mutually Exclusive Edits
    By heiditipherwell in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-26-2012, 06:30 PM
  3. CCI Edits - I have a carrier disputing
    By catrina.thomas in forum Medicare Regulations
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 12:17 PM
  4. CCI Edits
    By dhuston in forum Medical Coding General Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-13-2009, 08:34 AM
  5. Cci Edits
    By rcclary in forum Gastroenterology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 07:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Enjoying Our Forums?

AAPC forums are a benefit of membership. Joining AAPC grants you unlimited access, allowing you to post questions and participate with our community of over 150,000 professionals.

Join Now Continue Reading Without Full Access

Already a Member?

Login

Close Message

In addition to full participation on AAPC forums, as a member you will be able to:

  • Access to the largest healthcare job database in the world.
  • Join over 150,000 members of the healthcare network in the world.
  • Be a part of an industry leading organization that drives the business side of healthcare.
  • Save anywhere from 10%-50% with exclusive member discounts on courses, books, study materials, and conferences.
  • Access to discounts at hundreds of restaurants, travel destinations, retail stores, and service providers. AAPC members also have opportunities to save on heath, life, and liability insurance.
  • Become a member of a local chapter and attend regular meetings.