Go Back   AAPC Forum > Medical Coding > Modifiers
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2009, 01:31 PM
Sborkowski Sborkowski is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Sborkowski is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Modifier 51 Versus Modifier 59

My billing company is insisting that my office no longer use modifier 51 and to append modifier 59 in place of. I feel this is incorrect but how should they bill multiple procedures if the insurances are not allowing the 51 any longer. This is in Delaware. Any advice would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:47 PM
pamtienter pamtienter is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 324
pamtienter is on a distinguished road

I don't agree that the 59 modifier replaces the 51 modifier but a lot of insurance companies treat the 51 modifier as informational only. It used to be used to designate which procedures received the multiple procedure reduction but payers go by the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule now so don't rely on the physicians to provide that information any more.

The 59 modifier designates that a procedure is separate and independent from another procedure billed and relates to CCI edits. It should only be used if there is no other applicable or appropriate modifier that could be used instead.

Is it that insurances aren't allowing it anymore or is it just unnecessary? I don't know what it hurts to use it if they just aren't recognizing it. I also wouldn't just substitute the 59 across the board because that could raise some red flags (as well as possibly being inappropriate in a lot of cases). I'd check into it further.
Pam Tienter, CPC, COC, CPC-P, CCS-P, CPMA, CPC-I
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:51 PM
magnolia1 magnolia1 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 456
magnolia1 is on a distinguished road

Totally wrong!

Have they looked at the descriptions of those two modifiers in the CPT book?
Are they aware that this may send up a red flag to Medicare (and possibly OIG??).
Modifier 59 is only to be used if there is no other modifier that better describes a "separately distinct" non-E/M procedure that has been performed.
That has nothing to do with "multiple procedures" being done.
I would consider looking for another billing company......
Karen Maloney, CPC
Data Quality Specialist
Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 04:59 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 11,076
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough

Well said Karen! I totally agree, I provided consulting service with a billing company that also thought and taught their coders that the 51 and the 59 were one in the same, what a pain that was to re teach! Many commercial carriers have dropped the 51 from their electronic edits because they did feel it was unnecessary, so it is not that they do not recognize it, it is just not adjudicated properly in the electronic edits. But as karen stated this is not a substitute across the board for the 59, they never did communicate the same information. Good Luck with this, what you want now is to hire an auditor to audit your billing service, you may be very unpleasantly surprised at what you learn!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ?2015, AAPC