Go Back   AAPC Forum > Practice Management > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-20-2014, 01:42 PM
cswan cswan is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 25
cswan is on a distinguished road
Default Limiting EM codes on a superbill

I?m wondering if anyone has a reference regarding the limiting of E/M codes on a superbill/encounter form?

Once upon a time, I was told that if the E/M CPT codes are limited on the superbill, it can be interpreted to be ?directing? the provider to only choose those codes. Example: For Inpatient care, only the 99222 and 99223 are listed on the superbill. Leaving off the 99221 can look like the provider is being ?pushed? to choose a higher level.

In my heart, I know this is not good business practice to limit them on the superbill, and of course, providers need a reference, so I would really appreciate any help on this

Cindy L. Swan CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2014, 09:14 PM
cjhalk@yahoo.com cjhalk@yahoo.com is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 126
cjhalk@yahoo.com is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cswan View Post
I?m wondering if anyone has a reference regarding the limiting of E/M codes on a superbill/encounter form?

Once upon a time, I was told that if the E/M CPT codes are limited on the superbill, it can be interpreted to be ?directing? the provider to only choose those codes. Example: For Inpatient care, only the 99222 and 99223 are listed on the superbill. Leaving off the 99221 can look like the provider is being ?pushed? to choose a higher level.

In my heart, I know this is not good business practice to limit them on the superbill, and of course, providers need a reference, so I would really appreciate any help on this

Cindy L. Swan CPC, CEMC
I think limiting E&M codes presents a big problem. Leaving off an option gives the provider the idea that that code is not an option and overbilling most likely will take place. If you leave off 99221 and the provider only did a straight forward MDM and the only option for the provider to see is 99222 and higher, obviously that will lead to overbilling and over coding. I would most definitely get the 99221 on there. Better yet in my opinion is to just have the coder code off the H&P.

I think the best reference would be to have them look at their own notes. Have an auditor come in and audit just the 99221-99223. That way they can see their own work and see that they are over coding and over billing for the missing 99221. I did a short search, and I couldn't find any reference point that gives guidance to leaving or taking off E&M codes. But there is solid info out there regarding overbilling - you just have to look.

You could reference the great responses on your last post of this subject -
http://www.aapc.com/memberarea/forum...d.php?t=106033

This is a good article
http://www.aafp.org/news/practice-pr...racaudits.html

This is a good one
http://radiology.mckessonrevenews.co...her-eam-levels
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ?2015, AAPC