Go Back   AAPC Forum > Medical Coding > Plastic Surgery
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2007, 09:42 AM
cmartin cmartin is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 204
cmartin is on a distinguished road
Question Component separation in hernia repairs

Anyone have recommendations for coding component separation [with Alloderm onlay etc] in complex ventral hernia repairs?
Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 10:55 AM
Michaele1 Michaele1 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
Michaele1 is on a distinguished road

We use 15734 in the Dept. of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery at Washington University in St. Louis
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 02:12 PM
ldolyak ldolyak is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
ldolyak is on a distinguished road

What code would you use if you did not use the alloderm
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 07:15 AM
elane15 elane15 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
elane15 is on a distinguished road
Default component separation

Recently we were audited by a major payer for these procedures. They are really not a 15734 however very close. After much deliberation with our physicians and the physicians at the insurance company an agreement was made that the most appropriate billing would be as an unlisted abdominal procedure 49999 with a fee close the 15734. In addition to the 49999 you should also bill for the hernia repair when done as well as the implementation of the mesh. Even more recently this payer did a local seminar as a result of our collaboration on these procedures.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 03:36 PM
MLNURSE70 MLNURSE70 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
MLNURSE70 is on a distinguished road
Question Compartment Separation W/incision Hernia

We were instructed by the mesh producers and representatives that CPT 15734 is the code to use for compartment separation. We received payment by Unicare for our first procedural service performed in 2008 for bilateral procedure when done in conjunction with incisional hernia repair w/mesh - no denials - payment on first presentation of claim. This causes us some concern. I would like to hear from other CPCs about this issue.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:28 AM
emeskina's Avatar
emeskina emeskina is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kansas City MO
Posts: 21
emeskina is on a distinguished road
Exclamation There's more...

I've got two sources that contradict those statements. The PDF is too large to attached, but I'd be happy to fax it to you. You can reach me by e-mail ; eeskina@upamed.org

Erin Eskina, CPC
Truman Medical Centers/UPA
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 07:31 AM
sgochoco sgochoco is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
sgochoco is on a distinguished road
Default SGochoco

I would be very wary of taking advice or recommendations from the "mesh producer". They are in the business of selling their product, so they are only too happy to recommend a cpt code for the procedure. They have a different agenda than we Coders do. Even though it is billed as you say, and paid, that does not mean that it was coded correctly. We bill this procedure with an unlisted procedure code, in addition to the hernia and mesh if appropriate. We feel that our method is defendible in an audit.

Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:02 AM
acf7575 acf7575 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oak Ridge
Posts: 14
acf7575 is on a distinguished road

Our practice is also now visiting this scenario and we agree that the 15734 is not a 100% code, so therefore, should not be used. For our surgeons we are going to go with the 49999 as recommended here as well. We also have another component to this. Our provider has used Veritas bovine pericardium mesh as well. We are wondering if the add-on code 49568 provides accurate reimbursement for this. Some of our providers use Alloderm, which we use an unlisted code for this as recommended by the AMA through the General Surgery Coding Alert publication. Any thoughts if we should go the same route with the Veritas "mesh". We currently are using the 49568 add-on code.

One more question too... if basing the unlisted on the 15734 as a comparison, the RVUs for the incisional/ventral hernia repairs are less than the 15734 RVUs. So, would you code the 49999 as the primary procedure and get stuck with what ever the payer reimburses for unlisted codes or still post the hernia as the primary with the unlisted component separation as a secondary code?

Last edited by acf7575; 11-03-2009 at 03:20 PM. Reason: Spell check and added additional question.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ?2015, AAPC