Expand


Go Back   AAPC Forum > Medical Coding > Emergency Department
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-26-2009, 10:41 AM
JulesofColorado JulesofColorado is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 251
JulesofColorado is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Incision and Drainage Procedure

Patient had an I&D done of the right middle finger. Patient was prepped and cleansed with Betadine and alcohol and a #11 blade was used to make a superficial incision. Scant to small amount of purulent drainage was obtained and sent for culture and sensitivity.

I've tried every which way to find the ICD-9 and CPT code for this but I am not sure which to use.

Help!

Thank you
__________________
Julianne Sheetz, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2009, 11:04 AM
ARCPC9491 ARCPC9491 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 701
ARCPC9491 is on a distinguished road
Default

What about 10060?

Finger abscess is 681.00
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2009, 11:20 AM
coder21 coder21 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 63
coder21 is on a distinguished road
Default

Those are the two codes I would use.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2009, 11:48 AM
vdelucci vdelucci is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
vdelucci is on a distinguished road
Default

I&D of finger is 26010-Simple 26011 for Complicated (EG: Felon)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2009, 01:21 PM
ARCPC9491 ARCPC9491 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 701
ARCPC9491 is on a distinguished road
Default

I disagree with 26010 based on the documentation provided.

26010 goes to the subcutaneous tissue, requiring debridement & irrigation.

The note says "superficial" which is on the surface of the skin. 10060 is appropriate.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2009, 02:45 PM
JulesofColorado JulesofColorado is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 251
JulesofColorado is on a distinguished road
Default

I think I'll go with 10060, it makes the most sense to me. Thank you!
__________________
Julianne Sheetz, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-08-2009, 11:29 AM
LTibbetts LTibbetts is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangor, Maine
Posts: 719
LTibbetts is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I agree with the 10060. It does say "superficial" in your brief procedure note. If the provider went into subcutaneous tissue, they most likely would have documented it. Remember, you can only code what is documented so go with what you've got.
And also, never code something you might be unsure of. You can always query the provider for additional info if needed. Good luck!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-29-2009, 02:56 PM
ahinman ahinman is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania Chapter
Posts: 39
ahinman is on a distinguished road
Default

I realize this question is old news but I was wondering why some are opposed to the 26010 CPT? I use this for my finger abscesses and nowhere in the CPT Book can I find that for this code it has to be subcutaneous. I then looked it up in the Ingeix coders desk reference and it says that "the physician drains an abscess located on a finger. In 26010, the physician lances an abscess in the cutaneous tissue of a finger." So then the definition of cutaneous according to my Taber's Medical Dictionary is "Pert. to the skin."

So by using 26010 I feel that you are coding to the highest specificity available to you by your CPT.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-30-2009, 10:02 AM
Lisa Bledsoe Lisa Bledsoe is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 2,046
Lisa Bledsoe is on a distinguished road
Question Very interesting

I've always used 10060-10061 but based on the descriptions of these codes and the description of 26010-20611 in CDR and looking at RVU's; why wouldn't one use 26010-26011??
__________________
Lisa Bledsoe, CPC, CPMA
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-30-2009, 11:15 AM
diamonddiva diamonddiva is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
diamonddiva is on a distinguished road
Smile

I would agree with CPT 10060. This is an integumentary code vs CPT 26010 which is muskuloskeletal referring more to bone.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2015, AAPC