Go Back   AAPC Forum > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-31-2009, 12:45 PM
calderonmark calderonmark is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
calderonmark is on a distinguished road
Default Coding rapid flu testing

Does anyone know how to code for the rapid flu test. Each rapid flu test is for both influeza A and B viruses.

My thought was 87804x2 with a 59 modifier. Please advise
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2009, 01:19 PM
HBULLOCK HBULLOCK is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SALEM NH
Posts: 283
HBULLOCK is on a distinguished road
Default

We bill the rapid flu test with 87275 (b) and 87276 (a)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2009, 02:07 PM
kbarron kbarron is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seacoast- Dover New Hampshire
Posts: 603
kbarron is on a distinguished road
Default

We use 87804.
__________________
Karen Barron, CPC
Hampton New Hampshire Chapter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2009, 02:21 PM
Anna Weaver Anna Weaver is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 769
Anna Weaver is on a distinguished road
Default rapid flu

Here's what CPT assistant has to say:

Differentiating rapid influenza test, A and B strains on one device
CPT Assistant, December 2007 Page: 15 Category: Bonus Issue
Pathology and Laboratory

Question:

Please clarify whether reporting code 87804 two times, once with modifier 59 (87804, 87804 59), would be appropriate for differentiating rapid influenza tests; those providing separate, distinct results for both strains A and B on one device.

Answer:

The detection of both influenza A and B strains may be part of two entirely separate procedures or may be included within the same test device because these two analyses are not uncommonly requested by the clinician together. If the assays provided two separate results (eg, a result for influenza A and a result for influenza B), two units of 87804 would be appropriate. Modifier 59, Distinct procedural service, may be used to indicate that the two results represent separate services, when two units of 87804 are submitted.




CPT Assistant © Copyright 1990–2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2009, 02:18 PM
britbrit852003 britbrit852003 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 170
britbrit852003 is on a distinguished road
Default

We were told by the manufactorer of our rapid flu test to bill like this:
87804
87804/59
One unit on each.
We've been doing this for months and have no problems getting it paid.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2014, 07:06 AM
DianeLundberg DianeLundberg is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
DianeLundberg is on a distinguished road
Unhappy Rapid Flu Test

I just got a denial from Medicaid for duplicate line item for my rapid flu test A & B. I billed them as 87804 QW and 87804 QW, -59. Any suggestions? I had also billed for an E/M. Do I use a modifier -91 or -99 on the second flu test?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2014, 08:24 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 10,525
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DianeLundberg View Post
I just got a denial from Medicaid for duplicate line item for my rapid flu test A & B. I billed them as 87804 QW and 87804 QW, -59. Any suggestions? I had also billed for an E/M. Do I use a modifier -91 or -99 on the second flu test?
On your second item the 59 needs to be first the QW second
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ?2015, AAPC