Go Back   AAPC Forum > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2009, 01:56 AM
subhasini subhasini is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
subhasini is on a distinguished road
Smile ICD coding for “resolved conditions”

Hi All,

Please guide me ICD coding for “resolved conditions”.

As per the general coding guidelines we would not code for any resolved conditions since the condition is no longer exists. But we come across the condition “resolved pneumonia”. Under pneumonia in ICD 9-CM index we noticed the non essential modifier for pneumonia is mentioned as unresolved as well as resolved pneumonia.

Let me know how to code, 1) resolved pneumonia and 2) history of pneumonia.

Can we code as 1) 486 (even if the condition is resolved as per the document)?

If the physician evaluates for the condition and the same condition is resolved, we code the history. But in this scenario mentioned above can we code the resolved pneumonia as 486 or V12.61.


Subashini, CPC, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 10:08 AM
pcheshier pcheshier is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
pcheshier is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

When looking up pneumonia in the ICD 9 book, it lists (resolved) in the description with 486 as the code. That's what I have been doing.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2010, 10:56 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 11,069
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough

Several years ago there was a coding clinic on this subject. If the return visit is to followup on an infection such as pneumonia, UTI, otitis media, etc. then you code the acute infection code as the reason for the encounter since we must assume that condition still exisits and is the reason for the visit. If on that encounter the infection is deemed resolved then if the physician requests another followup encounter the 3rd visit is coded as a V67.x code for followup.
It made sense to me then and still makes sense today.

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ?2015, AAPC