Expand


Go Back   AAPC Forum > Medical Coding > Emergency Department
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-06-2010, 03:21 PM
cpccoder2008 cpccoder2008 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: arkansas
Posts: 597
cpccoder2008 is on a distinguished road
Default FB removal

A patient come in with a fish hook through cheek, the physician removed it, is there a cpt code for this ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2010, 01:58 AM
jmoore3 jmoore3 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Topeka, Kansas Chapter
Posts: 4
jmoore3 is on a distinguished road
Default

If the provider didn't make an incision to remove it, then the removal is part of the E/M service. Here is a forum that I found that explains this as well Hope this helps!

http://www.aapc.com/memberarea/forum...ead.php?t=4605

Jessica, CPC-A
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2010, 06:34 AM
vj_tiwari's Avatar
vj_tiwari vj_tiwari is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: International Member
Posts: 194
vj_tiwari is on a distinguished road
Default

Hey,

If this is subcutaneous foreign body then try 10120 with 910.6 as ICD dx.

Hope this helps!

VJ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-07-2010, 06:44 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 10,027
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

10120 states the physician must make an incision so it really depends on the documentation. If no incision is made the I agree it is part of the E&M if an incision is made then it depends on how deep he had to go to remove the fb. When you say through the cheek it is unclear if you mean from the outside to the inside of the mouth. This could be extremely simple to very complex so more information is needed.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:11 PM
grovey grovey is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: daytona beach, Fl
Posts: 9
grovey is on a distinguished road
Default

If the doctor states he backed the fish hook out (barb is backed out), this can be considered cutting
for FB removal.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-2010, 12:34 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 10,027
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grovey View Post
If the doctor states he backed the fish hook out (barb is backed out), this can be considered cutting
for FB removal.
No it is not the same thing as making an incision. If he makes an incision close to the hook in order to be able to remove it then Ok but if he just backs it out then no it is not the same.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2010, 02:22 PM
cbeebe cbeebe is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
cbeebe is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree that if no incision is made it should be part of the E/M level. I am in the process of trying to convince our head of ER as well! Does anyone have a reference or quote from CPT or AHA to that effect?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-08-2010, 06:36 AM
OCD_coder's Avatar
OCD_coder OCD_coder is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville AAPC Chapter
Posts: 936
OCD_coder has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default FB removal

Both Dennis Beck, MD and Michael Granovsky, MD, who are leading authorities in ED medicine agree that an incision must be made in order for foreign body removal.

Also, in the Ingenix Procedures book it clearly states for FB removal ....the physician makes an incision... so there is your written proof.

Last edited by OCD_coder; 08-28-2010 at 01:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-08-2010, 06:45 AM
RebeccaWoodward* RebeccaWoodward* is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,129
RebeccaWoodward* will become famous soon enough
Default

I have seen some scenarios where the provider simply clipped one end of the fish hook and then pulled it out.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-13-2010, 02:40 AM
sam_son sam_son  is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 76
sam_son  is on a distinguished road
Default FB

Hi

For FB removal if it is removed by physician with some instruments is used and local anesthesia is documented , and if incision is not made - we are using 10120 with 52 modifier.

regards
__________________
SAMSON
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2015, AAPC