Anesthesia Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Choose 00160 for Nosebleed Crosswalk

Question: Our anesthesiologist provided general anesthesia during a morning surgery. Later that day, the patient started bleeding through the nose so the surgeon took her back to the operating room. His notes state "re-exploration nose for control of postop bleeding" and he diagnosed "epistaxis." How should we code anesthesia for the return case (the same anesthesiologist handled both cases)?Answer: When a patient returns to the operating room for post operative bleeding, your diagnosis and a modified procedure code should help explain the situation to the insurance company. Although the diagnosis is indicated as epistaxis, the more correct choice likely is post-operative bleeding (998.11) from the previous surgery as the notes indicate "re-exploration nose."Report the procedure with 00160 (Anesthesia for procedures on nose and accessory sinuses; not otherwise specified) and include modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to indicate the anesthesia was a separate service from the original procedure. If the payer [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Anesthesia Coding Alert

View All