EM Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Not All Follow-ups Are Created Equal

Question: We recently finished our first internal audit and found a potential issue: One of the doctors told me that they only chose level 99212 when it is a follow-up from a previous visit. He chooses levels 99213 and above for everything else. I do not believe it is that simple because I thought even if it was not a follow-up visit, something like a minor cold might warrant 99212. Can you advise?

Washington Subscriber


Answer: 
You are correct. Not only can a follow-up problem-oriented visit for an established patient warrant a “low-level” code such as 99211 or 99212, but your coding should never hinge solely on whether a problem is new.


The selection of an E/M level should be based on documentation and medical necessity.

If you have documentation that supports a comprehensive history and a comprehensive exam but you are sending the patient home with a plan of rest and symptomatic treatment with mention of over-the-counter medications, that is a low level of medical decision-making, which typically would not warrant billing 99214.

When physicians announce that they will only choose a particular level of service for a certain type of patient, that is typically a learned behavior which can hurt the physician in both ways (undercoding and overcoding). A “minor cold” could warrant a 99212 — but it could also warrant a 99214 depending on the patient’s other coexisting conditions, symptoms, and history. Each case should be coded individually based on the documentation.

Other Articles in this issue of

EM Coding Alert

View All