Gastroenterology Coding Alert

Proper Use of Control of Bleeding Codes May Yield Higher Reimbursements

Medicare often includes control of bleeding in its reimbursement for endoscopic polypectomies, assuming that the bleeding has been caused by the removal of the polyp, tumor or lesion. But under certain circumstances, gastroenterologists can bill separately for the procedure.

The amount of bleeding involved in most polypectomies usually is not significant and often is controlled by the electrical current used to excise the polyp, according to Kathy Anderson, RN, director of nursing and plant manager of the Indianapolis Endoscopy Center, an ambulatory surgical center serving four gastroenterologists.

On the other hand, there are many situations when the gastroenterologist will perform an endoscopy where the primary purpose ends up being to control bleeding. A heater probe, bi-cap probe or a laser is used to cauterize the bleeding tissue. Some gastroenterologists may prefer to use an injection of epinephrine to control any hemorrhaging.

These control of bleeding techniques frequently are used on arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and cases of diverticulosis. A patient also may have bleeding tumors or polyps that are too large to be removed endoscopically and must be cauterized to temporarily stop the bleeding until they can be removed surgically. Another situation requiring cauterization is post-polypectomy bleeding, which can occur as much as two weeks after the original procedure, requiring the gastroenterologist to re-insert the endoscope.

In these cases, gastroenterologists should bill for an endoscopic control of bleeding and use a code such as 43255 (upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; with control of bleeding, any method) or 45382 (colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to spenic flexure; with control of bleeding, any method), advises Anderson.

Codes for Control of Bleeding

43227Esophagoscopy, rigid or flexible; with control of
bleeding, any method

43255Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with control of
bleeding, any method

44366Small intestinal endoscopy not including ileum with control of bleeding, any method

44378Small intestinal endoscopy including ileum with
control of bleeding, any method

45317Proctosigmoidoscopy, rigid; with control of
bleeding, any method

45334Sigmoidoscopy, flexible; with control of bleeding,
any method

45382Colonoscopy with control of bleeding, any method

46614Anoscopy with control of bleeding, any method

Code for Polypectomy or
Control of Bleeding?

The coding dilemma occurs when a gastroenterologist performs both a polypectomy and a control of bleeding procedure at the same time.

If the two procedures are performed in the same area of the gastrointestinal system, Medicare will not reimburse for both procedures, says Anderson. She recommends that gastroenterologists bill for the control of bleeding procedure because it has the higher level of labor intensity.

Peg Hopwood, supervisor of patient accounts for Rockford Gastroenterology, a practice of nine gastroenterologists in Rockford, IL, agrees with Anderson and points out that a polypectomy using hot biopsy forceps in [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.