Gastroenterology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

If You Dislodge a Foreign Body, Is It a Removal?

Question: Can I report biopsy ( CPT 45380 ) on the same days as removal (for instance, 45384, 45385)? My payer routinely rejects these claims. Should I append modifier 59?


Washington Subscriber


Answer: Many clinicians and coding experts would argue that you are justified in reporting foreign- body removal (43247, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; with removal of foreign body). But--as you note--this would technically assume that the physician had removed the bolus from the patient's body entirely.

Clearly, however, the physician service in this case exceeds a simple diagnostic EGD (43235, -diagnostic, with or without collection of specimen[s] by brushing or washing [separate procedure]).

Therefore, to err on the side of caution, your best solution is to report 43247 and append modifier 52 (Reduced services). Include a brief note with your claim explaining that the physician dislodged the bolus into the stomach using the endoscope rather than removed it from the body entirely.

Your pay shouldn't suffer: Common sense would suggest that the physician isn't really doing less work by -dislodging- the bolus than he would by -removing- it. By appending 52, you are following the letter of the coding guidelines, but in this case you really shouldn't expect the insurer to reduce payment for 43247.

Other Articles in this issue of

Gastroenterology Coding Alert

View All